Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2890/2005 AI generated

Suspension of imprisonment for family hardship: sufficiency of socioeconomic grounds under Articles 453(c) and 455 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Case Number Decizia nr. 2890/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the prisoner's appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding the Court of Appeal's decision to reject his petition to suspend the execution of his prison sentence, and ordered the appellant to pay 800,000 lei in court costs, of which 200,000 lei was advanced from the Ministry of Justice. The dispute concerned a criminal execution procedure where the convicted individual sought a three-month suspension of his imprisonment due to the precarious economic situation of his eight-member family, arguing that this measure was necessary to remediate their hardships. The court determined under Articles 455 and 453(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure that the grounds were insufficient, noting that even a temporary suspension would not enable the prisoner to rectify the family's economic difficulties, and applied Article 385, paragraph 2, letter b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to finality the lower court's rejection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 453 lit. c) C. proc. pen, art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen, art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Suspension of imprisonment for family hardship: sufficiency of socioeconomic grounds under Articles 453(c) and 455 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: The dispute concerned a criminal execution procedure where the convicted individual sought a three-month suspension of his imprisonment due to the precarious economic situation of his eight-member family, arguing that this measure was necessary to remediate their hardships. The court determined under Articles 455 and 453(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure that the grounds were insufficient, noting that even a temporary suspension would not enable the prisoner to rectify the family's economic difficulties, and applied Article 385, paragraph 2, letter b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to finality the lower court's rejection.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of prison sentence family hardship imprisonment code of criminal procedure grounds for cassation prohibition of imprisonment for debt

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 453 lit. c) C. proc. pen
455, raportat la art. 453 lit. c) C. proc. pen., executarea pedepsei închisorii nu poate fi întreruptă.
art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen
Legal provision justifying the dismissal of the cassation appeal as unfounded.
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the appellate review and judgment.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 168/2004
Criminal sentence suspension for family hardship: insufficient material hardship under Article 453(c) Code of Criminal Procedure
Decizia nr. 1049/2005
Suspension of prison sentence execution for family hardship under Article 453(1)(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Decizia nr. 58/2004
Judicial suspension of imprisonment for family hardship: adequacy of family means and exclusion of medical grounds
Decizia nr. 168/2003
Suspension of prison sentence for family hardship: failure to meet special circumstances requirement
Decizia nr. 3164/2006
Suspension of prison sentence for family hardship: sufficiency of social evidence under Article 453(1)(c) and 455 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive for the appellate review and judgment.

art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen.

Legal provision justifying the dismissal of the cassation appeal as unfounded.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

În baza lucrărilor de la dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința penală nr. 51 din 20 ianuarie 2005, Tribunalul București, secția I penală, a respins, ca nefondată, cererea de întrerupere a executării pedepsei formulată de condamnatul D.P. pentru motive familiale.

Împotriva acestei sentințe condamnatul a declarat apel solicitând întreruperea executării pedepsei.

Prin decizia penală nr. 167/ A din 11 martie 2005, Curtea de Apel București, secția I penală, a respins, ca nefondat, apelul condamnatului.

Și împotriva acestei decizii pronunțată de instanța de control judiciar, condamnatul a declarat recurs reiterând același motiv, respectiv, întreruperea executării pedepsei.

Recursul este nefondat.

Analizând motivul invocat de petentul condamnat, situația economică precară a familiei sale formată din 8 membri în raport cu concluziile raportului de anchetă socială întocmit de O.A.S. din cadrul Consiliului Local sector 2 București și prevederile art. 455, raportat la art. 453 lit. c) C. proc. pen., executarea pedepsei închisorii nu poate fi întreruptă.

De altfel, chiar în situația în care s-ar dispune întreruperea executării pedepsei potrivit legii pe o durată de 3 luni, inculpatul ar fi în imposibilitate de a remedia situația cu care se confruntă familia sa.

Ca atare, Curtea, în temeiul prevederilor art. 38515 pct. 2 lit. b) C. proc. pen., va respinge, ca nefondat, recursul declarat de condamnat.

Văzând și prevederile art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.;

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge, ca nefondat, recursul declarat de condamnatul D.P. împotriva deciziei penale nr. 167/ A din 11 martie 2005 a Curții de Apel București, secția I penală.

Obligă pe recurent la plata sumei de 800.000 lei cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 200.000 lei, reprezentând onorariul pentru apărarea din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, azi 9 mai 2005.