Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 7125/2005 AI generated

Recourse transferred to Court of Appeal due to jurisdictional reassignment; prior dismissal upheld pending new review.

Case Number Decizia nr. 7125/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declined to rule on the merits and ordered the case transferred to the Constanța Court of Appeal for competent adjudication, thereby leaving the prior judgments (trial court dismissal and appellate rejection of the plaintiff's claim) intact pending the new review. The dispute involved a plaintiff's action against private parties and a state agency, which had been dismissed for lack of active procedural standing at first instance and on appeal; the plaintiff then filed a recourse challenging the appellate decision. Legally, the Court applied Article II paragraph (3) of Law No. 219/2005, read with Article 2 point 2 of the Civil Procedure Code as amended, determining that under the new jurisdictional rules the recourse fell within the appellate court's competence, not its own, and thus remitted the case accordingly.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2 pct. 2 C. proc. civ, art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005; Recourse transferred to Court of Appeal due to jurisdictional reassignment; prior dismissal upheld pending new review: The dispute involved a plaintiff's action against private parties and a state agency, which had been dismissed for lack of active procedural standing at first instance and on appeal; the plaintiff then filed a recourse challenging the appellate decision. Legally, the Court applied Article II paragraph (3) of Law No. 219/2005, read with Article 2 point 2 of the Civil Procedure Code as amended, determining that under the new jurisdictional rules the recourse fell within the appellate court's competence, not its own, and thus remitted the case accordingly.

Keywords

AI generated
reassignment of claim standing to appeal civil dispute cassation review procedural review rule of law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2 pct. 2 C. proc. civ
219/2005, coroborate cu art. 2 pct. 2 C. proc. civ., modificat prin aceeași lege.
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005
Basis for sending the case to the Court of Appeal Constanța due to lack of jurisdiction of the High Court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 6565/2005
Jurisdictional remand of civil appeal due to statutory transfer of appellate competence
Încheierea nr. 6486/2012
Motion for transfer of civil case dismissed; appellate jurisdiction retained by original court
Încheierea nr. 1658/2013
Request for transfer of jurisdiction to another court
Încheierea nr. 265/2013
Transfer of appellate case to another court of appeal following petition for removal
Încheierea nr. 7449/2012
Request for transfer of civil jurisdiction from Court of Appeal to High Court

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005

Basis for sending the case to the Court of Appeal Constanța due to lack of jurisdiction of the High Court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Judecătoria Constanța, prin sentința civilă nr. 875 din 6 ianuarie 2004, a respins acțiunea formulată de reclamantul K.S.A. în contradictoriu cu pârâții G.Ș., G.C. și RAEDPP Constanța, pentru lipsa calității procesuale active.

Apelul declarat de reclamant a fost respins ca nefondat prin decizia civilă nr. 874 din 6 septembrie 2004 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Constanța.

Împotriva acestei decizii reclamantul a declarat recurs, referitor la care sunt incidente dispozițiile art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005, coroborate cu art. 2 pct. 2 C. proc. civ., modificat prin aceeași lege.

În raport de aceste dispoziții recursul dedus cauzei este potrivit Legii nr. 219/2005, de competența Curții de Apel Constanța, căreia i se va trimite cauza în acest sens.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

În baza art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 219/2005 trimite cauza spre competentă soluționare la Curtea de Apel Constanța.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 23 septembrie 2005.