Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 6162/2005 AI generated

Inadmissibility of appeal against denial of correction of material errors in a final civil judgment

Case Number Decizia nr. 6162/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the appeal as inadmissible, thereby upholding the appellate court's 2005 order that had rejected a request to correct material errors. The dispute involved a party attempting to challenge a prior appellate decision from 2000 through a post-judgment motion for correction of material errors, which had been rejected by the Court of Appeal. The decisive legal basis was the procedural rule that appellate rulings on motions for correction of material errors are subject to the same avenues of legal recourse as the underlying judgment itself; because the original 2000 civil decision was final and irrevocable, the appeal against the 2005 order denying the correction was legally inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2813 C. proc. civ, art. 281 C. proc. civ; Inadmissibility of appeal against denial of correction of material errors in a final civil judgment: The dispute involved a party attempting to challenge a prior appellate decision from 2000 through a post-judgment motion for correction of material errors, which had been rejected by the Court of Appeal. The decisive legal basis was the procedural rule that appellate rulings on motions for correction of material errors are subject to the same avenues of legal recourse as the underlying judgment itself; because the original 2000 civil decision was final and irrevocable, the appeal against the 2005 order denying the correction was legally inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
res judicata correction of material error procedural orders civil dispute appealable interlocutory decision revision of a judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2813 C. proc. civ
This provision established that the appeal against the order rejecting the motion for correction was inadmissible because the underlying judgment was final and irrevocable.
art. 281 C. proc. civ
Referenced as the legal basis for the original motion for correction of material errors, which determined the applicable avenue of recourse for the subsequent appeal.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
decizia civilă nr. 9508/2000
Cererea de îndreptare a fost formulată cu privire la decizia civilă nr. 9508/2000 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Craiova, prin care s-a soluționat recursul declarat de reclamantul M.N.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3546/2011
Appeal against refusal to correct material error in civil decision declared inadmissible
Decizia nr. 2049/2023
Inadmissibility of appeal against final judgment on correction of material error
Decizia nr. 2619/2013
Appeal against material-error correction order dismissed as inadmissible after underlying ruling became final.
Decizia nr. 5706/2012
Appeal against ruling on material error correction declared inadmissible as underlying judgment irrevocable
Decizia nr. 2051/2014
Inadmissibility of appeal against order on material error correction of final judgment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 2813 C. proc. civ.

This provision established that the appeal against the order rejecting the motion for correction was inadmissible because the underlying judgment was final and irrevocable.

art. 281 C. proc. civ.

Referenced as the legal basis for the original motion for correction of material errors, which determined the applicable avenue of recourse for the subsequent appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele :

Prin încheierea nr. 2 din 18 ianuarie 2005 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Craiova în dosarul nr. 7401/2004, a fost respinsă cererea de îndreptare a erorilor materiale, strecurate în decizia civilă nr. 9508 din 22 august 2000 a Curții de Apel Craiova, cerere formulată de petentul M.N. în contradictoriu cu intimații H.D., H.A., P.R., Comisia Locală de aplicare a Legii nr. 18/1991 Târgu Jiu, Comisia de aplicare a Legii nr. 18/1991 Gorj.

Împotriva acestei hotărâri a declarat recurs petentul M.N. solicitând casarea acesteia și admiterea cererii.

Recursul nu este admisibil.

Cererea de îndreptare a fost formulată cu privire la decizia civilă nr. 9508/2000 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Craiova, prin care s-a soluționat recursul declarat de reclamantul M.N. împotriva deciziei civile nr. 2410/2000 a Tribunalului Gorj, hotărârea dată astfel fiind irevocabilă.

Potrivit prevederilor art. 2813 C. proc. civ., încheierile pronunțate în temeiul art. 281 C. proc. civ. sunt supuse acelorași căi de atac ca și hotărârea în legătură cu care s-a solicitat îndreptarea.

Așa fiind, cum hotărârea respectivă este irevocabilă rezultă că recursul îndreptat împotriva încheierii prin care s-a respins cererea de îndreptare a acestei hotărâri este inadmisibil, urmând a fi, deci, respins ca atare.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibil recursul declarat de petentul M.N., împotriva încheierii din 18 ianuarie 2005 a Curții de Apel Craiova, secția civilă, dosar nr. 7401/2004.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 8 iulie 2005.