Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 4327/2005 AI generated

Defendant's appeal referred to Court of Appeal of Cluj, bail refunded.

Case Number Decizia nr. 4327/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declined its jurisdiction and referred the appeal to the Court of Appeal of Cluj, which had issued the challenged decision; it also ordered the refund of the posted bail. The dispute involved an appeal filed by the defendant against the civil decision no. 199/A of 30 January 2004, and the Court applied the procedural rules as amended by Emergency Ordinance no. 65/2004, approved with modifications by Law no. 493/2004, specifically Article 3 point 21 of the Civil Procedure Code, which assigns jurisdiction over such appeals to the court of appeal. The decision was declared irrevocable.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ, art. II alin. (3) din lege; Defendant's appeal referred to Court of Appeal of Cluj, bail refunded: The dispute involved an appeal filed by the defendant against the civil decision no. 199/A of 30 January 2004, and the Court applied the procedural rules as amended by Emergency Ordinance no. 65/2004, approved with modifications by Law no. 493/2004, specifically Article 3 point 21 of the Civil Procedure Code, which assigns jurisdiction over such appeals to the court of appeal. The decision was declared irrevocable.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute declining of jurisdiction e-justice procedural orders rule of law emergency ordinance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ
Determines the competence of the court of appeal to resolve the appeal.
art. II alin. (3) din lege
Justifies the decision to decline jurisdiction in favor of the court of appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 541/2018
Jurisdiction declined; appeal over 200,000-lei damages claim referred to court of appeal.
Decizia nr. 3473/2018
Romanian High Court declines jurisdiction and remits unpaid-rent appeal to Cluj Court of Appeal.
Decizia nr. 1377/2018
Jurisdiction declined; revision appeal transferred to Court of Appeal as superior court.
Decizia nr. 2305/2018
Recourse appeal referred to Cluj Court of Appeal; appellate judgments on 98,083 RON regress claim upheld.
Încheierea nr. 4346/2005
Jurisdiction declined and appeal referred to Court of Appeal Craiova under amended jurisdictional rules.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ.

Determines the competence of the court of appeal to resolve the appeal.

art. II alin. (3) din lege

Justifies the decision to decline jurisdiction in favor of the court of appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Din examinarea lucrărilor dosarului, constată următoarele:

Recursul de față a fost declarat împotriva deciziei civile nr. 199/A din 30 ianuarie 2004, pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Cluj.

Văzând că, în raport de obiectul litigiului, sunt incidente în cauză prevederile art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ., astfel cum a fost modificat prin O.U.G. nr. 65 din 9 septembrie 2004, aprobată cu unele nuanțări prin Legea nr. 493 din 10 noiembrie 2004, se constată că recursul de față este de competența curții de apel, motiv pentru care, în raport cu dispozițiile art. II alin. (3) din lege,

DISPUNE:

Declină competența de soluționare a recursului declarat de pârâta M.F. împotriva deciziei civile nr. 199/A din 30 ianuarie 2004 a Curții de Apel Cluj în favoarea aceleiași instanțe.

Dispune restituirea cauțiunii în sumă de 15 milioane lei consemnată cu recipisa nr. 42.30.01/04/40.6/000287 la CEC, sucursala Victoria, recurentei M.F.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată, în ședință publică, astăzi 24 mai 2005.