Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 7454/2005 AI generated

Appeal in case valued up to 1 billion lei assigned to Tribunal of Iași; conflicting declinations quashed.

Case Number Decizia nr. 7454/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice resolved a negative jurisdictional conflict by assigning the appeal (recurs) against a first-instance judgment to the Tribunal of Iași, which therefore prevailed; the Court of Appeal's and Tribunal's competing declinations of competence were set aside, and the case remains pending before the Tribunal. The dispute concerned a civil matter valued at up to 1 billion lei, originally decided by the Judecătoria Iași in a judgment that was then appealed. Decisively, under Articles 282¹ and 299 of the Civil Procedure Code, a judgment in a case valued at up to 1 billion lei is subject only to appeal by way of recurs, and Article 2(3) assigns exclusive jurisdiction over such appeals to the tribunal, not the court of appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 22 C. proc. civ, art. 299 C. proc. civ, art. 2 pct. 3 C. proc. civ, Art. 20 C. proc. civ, Art. 2821 C. proc. civ; Appeal in case valued up to 1 billion lei assigned to Tribunal of Iași; conflicting declinations quashed: The dispute concerned a civil matter valued at up to 1 billion lei, originally decided by the Judecătoria Iași in a judgment that was then appealed. Decisively, under Articles 282¹ and 299 of the Civil Procedure Code, a judgment in a case valued at up to 1 billion lei is subject only to appeal by way of recurs, and Article 2(3) assigns exclusive jurisdiction over such appeals to the tribunal, not the court of appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute civil judgment exclusive jurisdiction assigned competence e-justice appealable interlocutory decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 22 C. proc. civ
Basis for the referral of the case to the High Court to resolve the competence conflict (cited in the referral context leading to the final ruling).
art. 299 C. proc. civ
Determines the appeal as recourse, supporting the competence ruling in the dispositive.
art. 2 pct. 3 C. proc. civ
Establishes the tribunal's exclusive competence to hear the recourse, forming the main ground for the decision.
Art. 20 C. proc. civ
Used by the High Court as the procedural basis to settle the negative conflict of competence.
Art. 2821 C. proc. civ
Justifies that the decision is subject only to appeal before the tribunal, supporting the competence ruling.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 7456/2005
Jurisdictional conflict resolved: property appeal is recur to Iași Tribunal, not Court of Appeal, given sub-threshold value.
Decizia nr. 978/2006
Commercial jurisdictional conflict over litigation value exceeding one billion lei and appellate competence
Decizia nr. 7486/2005
Jurisdictional conflict resolved; appeal assigned to Sibiu Tribunal as recourse.
Decizia nr. 3656/2005
Jurisdictional conflict over appeal competence for sale contract resolution under one billion lei price threshold
Decizia nr. 7457/2005
Competence to hear appeal of first-instance judgment under 1 billion lei threshold

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 20 C. proc. civ.

Used by the High Court as the procedural basis to settle the negative conflict of competence.

Art. 22 C. proc. civ.

Basis for the referral of the case to the High Court to resolve the competence conflict (cited in the referral context leading to the final ruling).

Art. 2821 C. proc. civ.

Justifies that the decision is subject only to appeal before the tribunal, supporting the competence ruling.

Art. 299 C. proc. civ.

Determines the appeal as recourse, supporting the competence ruling in the dispositive.

Art. 2 pct. 3 C. proc. civ.

Establishes the tribunal's exclusive competence to hear the recourse, forming the main ground for the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra conflictului negativ de competență de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Obiectul litigiului dedus cauzei are o valoare de până la 1 miliard de lei și a fost soluționat în primă instanță de Judecătoria Iași prin sentința civilă nr. 10072 din 8 octombrie 2003.

Referitor la soluționarea căii de atac împotriva acestei sentințe Curtea de Apel Iași prin încheierea din 16 martie 2005 și Tribunalul Iași, prin decizia civilă nr. 444 din 3 iunie 2005 s-au declarat fiecare a fi necompetente, situație în care, în baza art. 22 C. proc. civ., pricina a fost înaintată la Înalta Curte pentru a hotărî asupra conflictului negativ de competență ivit în cauză.

Întrucât hotărârea atacată a fost dată într-un litigiu al cărui obiect are o valoare de până la 1 miliard de lei inclusiv, rezultă că potrivit art. 2821 și art. 299 C. proc. civ. este supusă numai recursului, de competență exclusivă tribunalului, cum prevede art. 2 pct. 3 C. proc. civ.

Așa fiind, în temeiul art. 20 și urm. C. proc. civ. urmează a fi stabilită competența de soluționare a căii de atac dedusă cauzei în favoarea Tribunalului Iași.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Stabilește în favoarea Tribunalului Iași competența de soluționare a recursului declarat împotriva sentinței civile nr. 10072 din 8 octombrie 2003 a Judecătoriei Iași.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 septembrie 2005.