Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 6302/2004 AI generated

Recourse to jurisdictional regulator: nullity for lack of motivation in appeal against inadmissible cancellation challenge

Case Number Decizia nr. 6302/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice ruled that the appeal declared by the claimant was null and void, thereby upholding the lower court's decision that had previously dismissed the claimant's cancellation challenge as inadmissible. The dispute concerned a "regulator of jurisdiction" proceeding, where the Court of Appeal had found the initial cancellation challenge procedurally deficient because the underlying judgment had been issued by a court designated to resolve the jurisdictional conflict on the merits rather than as an appellate instance. Relying on Article 306(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court determined the appeal was null due to the claimant's failure to provide mandatory legal arguments within the statutory deadline, and noting the absence of public order grounds to intervene ex officio, the court issued an irrevocable decree of nullity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 318 C. proc. civ, art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Recourse to jurisdictional regulator: nullity for lack of motivation in appeal against inadmissible cancellation challenge: The dispute concerned a "regulator of jurisdiction" proceeding, where the Court of Appeal had found the initial cancellation challenge procedurally deficient because the underlying judgment had been issued by a court designated to resolve the jurisdictional conflict on the merits rather than as an appellate instance. Relying on Article 306(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court determined the appeal was null due to the claimant's failure to provide mandatory legal arguments within the statutory deadline, and noting the absence of public order grounds to intervene ex officio, the court issued an irrevocable decree of nullity.

Keywords

AI generated
challenge of cancellation resolution of jurisdictional dispute civil judgment statutory grounds procedural nullity e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 318 C. proc. civ
A reținut instanța că nu erau întrunite cerințele art. 318 C. proc. civ., în sensul că hotărârea nu fusese pronunțată de o instanță de recurs, ci ca instanță desemnată cu soluționarea în fond a regulatorului de competență.
art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
The court applied this provision in the dispositive to declare the appeal null because it was not motivated within the legal deadline.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1921/2017
Admissibility of cancellation against nullity declaration: exclusion of substantive grievances and omitted motive review in procedural exceptions
Decizia nr. 5710/2005
Nullity of appeal for failure to motivate within statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 1410/2010
Nullity of appeal for failure to state grounds within statutory deadline
Decizia nr. 5917/2022
Recourse against a final decision in a cancellation challenge deemed inadmissible for lack of statutory remedy
Decizia nr. 2047/2023
Inadmissibility of appeal against decision rejecting cancellation challenge due to alignment of appeal avenues under Civil Procedure Code

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

The court applied this provision in the dispositive to declare the appeal null because it was not motivated within the legal deadline.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința civilă nr. 58 din 17 decembrie 2003, Curtea de Apel Timișoara, secția civilă, a respins ca inadmisibilă contestația în anulare formulată de reclamantul I.V. împotriva sentinței civile nr. 33 din 10 iulie 2003 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Timișoara, în dosarul nr. 5008/2003, având ca obiect regulator de competență.

A reținut instanța că nu erau întrunite cerințele art. 318 C. proc. civ., în sensul că hotărârea nu fusese pronunțată de o instanță de recurs, ci ca instanță desemnată cu soluționarea în fond a regulatorului de competență.

Împotriva sentinței civile nr. 8/2003, reclamantul a formulat recurs, pe care nu l-a motivat.

De aceea, văzând dispozițiile art. 306 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., potrivit cu care recursul este nul dacă nu a fost motivat în termenul legal, și nefiind identificate în cauză motive de ordine publică care să fie invocate din oficiu de instanță, prezentul recurs se va constata nul.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Constată nul recursul declarat de contestatorul I.V. împotriva deciziei civile nr. 58 din 17 decembrie 2003 a Curții de Apel Timișoara.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 12 noiembrie 2004.