Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 5581/2005 AI generated

Interlocutory adjournment order not independently appealable; appeal inadmissible, order stands.

Case Number Decizia nr. 5581/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) dismissed as inadmissible the appeal (recurs) brought by the defendants against the interim order of 29 March 2004 of the Timișoara Court of Appeal, which had merely adjourned the hearing in an appeal concerning a civil dispute over property against the Romanian State and other defendants; the challenged order remains in force. The court held that, under Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Code, preparatory/interlocutory orders cannot be appealed separately from the merits, except where they interrupt the course of the trial, which was not the case here. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible, and the decision was final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 282 C. proc. civ; Interlocutory adjournment order not independently appealable; appeal inadmissible, order stands: The court held that, under Article 282 of the Civil Procedure Code, preparatory/interlocutory orders cannot be appealed separately from the merits, except where they interrupt the course of the trial, which was not the case here. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible, and the decision was final.

Keywords

AI generated
appealable interlocutory decision article of civil procedure order of abandonment of proceedings late procedural objections judicial review referral to separate proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 282 C. proc. civ
Basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the challenged ruling was an interlocutory decision that could only be appealed together with the merits.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3188/2010
Recourse against interlocutory order dismissed as inadmissible for lack of separate appealability
Decizia nr. 1102/2013
Appeal against preparatory interlocutory order dismissed as inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 4022/2018
Intervenor's appeal against interlocutory adjournment order held inadmissible as preparatory ruling not separately appealable.
Decizia nr. 655/2010
Adjournment order not separately appealable; defendant's interlocutory appeal held inadmissible with costs.
Decizia nr. 2804/2010
Admissibility of separate appeal against interlocutory order issued by appellate court in suspension proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 282 C. proc. civ.

Basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the challenged ruling was an interlocutory decision that could only be appealed together with the merits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin încheierea din 29 martie 2004 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Timișoara în dosarul nr. 788/C/2004 s-a dispus amânarea judecării cauzei, la data de 19 aprilie 2004, cauza având ca obiect, soluționarea apelului declarat de reclamanta V.M. împotriva sentinței civile nr. 7782/2003 a Judecătoriei Timișoara, în contradictoriu cu pârâții I.E., I.C.C., I.C.G., B.L. și Statul Român prin Consiliul Local Timișoara.

Împotriva acestei încheierii au declarat recurs pârâții G.I. și G.G.

Recursul nu este admisibil.

Potrivit art. 282 C. proc. civ. împotriva încheierilor premergătoare nu se poate face apel decât o dată cu fondul, în afară de cazul când prin ele s-a întrerupt cursul judecății.

Așadar, cum în speță este atacată cu recurs tocmai o astfel de încheiere, preparatorie, cale de atac apare ca inadmisibilă, situație în care urmează a fi respinsă ca atare.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibil recursul declarat de pârâții G.I. și G.G. împotriva încheierii din 29 martie 2004 a Curții de Apel de Apel Timișoara pronunțată în dosarul nr. 788/C/2004.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 24 iunie 2005.