Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 4698/2005 AI generated

Jurisdictional declination for minor visiting schedule appeal due to statutory transfer of competence

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4698/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declared itself incompetent to hear the civil appeal and referred the case back to the Court of Appeal Constanța via declination of jurisdiction. The dispute involved an appeal filed by a defendant against a civil decision regarding the establishment of a visiting schedule for a minor. The Court determined that the appeal was inadmissible for it because the subject matter fell under the competence of the lower appellate court, as the initial decision was rendered before the entry into force of the normative modifications that would have allowed the High Court to assume jurisdiction. The operative legal basis was Article II(3) of Law No. 493/2004, which governs the transfer of pending cases to the competent jurisdiction following legislative changes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ, art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 493/2004; Jurisdictional declination for minor visiting schedule appeal due to statutory transfer of competence: The dispute involved an appeal filed by a defendant against a civil decision regarding the establishment of a visiting schedule for a minor. The Court determined that the appeal was inadmissible for it because the subject matter fell under the competence of the lower appellate court, as the initial decision was rendered before the entry into force of the normative modifications that would have allowed the High Court to assume jurisdiction. The operative legal basis was Article II(3) of Law No. 493/2004, which governs the transfer of pending cases to the competent jurisdiction following legislative changes.

Keywords

AI generated
jurisdictional matters transfer of competence statutory basis legislative competence legal status of minor regulation of visitation schedule

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ
În raport cu obiectul litigiului, stabilire program vizită minor, sunt incidente prevederile art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ., astfel cum a fost modificat prin O.U.G.
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 493/2004
The provision cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for removing the case from the roll and transferring it via declination of jurisdiction to the Court of Appeal Constanța.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3563/2018
Jurisdictional declination of cassation against tribunal appeal judgment due to lack of express statutory competence and temporal non-applicability of constitutional decision
Decizia nr. 1380/2018
Parental authority appeal over minors referred to Court of Appeal for lack of High Court jurisdiction.
Decizia nr. 2279/2019
Declination of jurisdiction for transfer of jurisdiction request to the Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 1406/2013
Declination of jurisdiction over appeal against non-appealable tribunal decision
Decizia nr. 3415/2018
Jurisdictional declination of appeal against second-instance suspension order for failure to designate domicile

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 493/2004

The provision cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for removing the case from the roll and transferring it via declination of jurisdiction to the Court of Appeal Constanța.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului civil de față:

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Cu adresa înregistrată la Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție sub nr. 24570 din 17 aprilie 2004, Curtea de Apel Constanța, a trimis spre soluționare recursul declarat de pârâta I.M. împotriva deciziei nr. 225/C din 17 martie 2004 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Constanța, secția civilă, fixându-se termen pentru soluționare la 2 iunie 2005.

În raport cu obiectul litigiului, stabilire program vizită minor, sunt incidente prevederile art. 3 pct. 21 C. proc. civ., astfel cum a fost modificat prin O.U.G. nr. 65 din 9 septembrie 2004, aprobată prin Legea nr. 493 din 10 noiembrie 2004.

La termenul din 2 iunie 2005, a constatat că se impune a fi analizată din oficiu, competența de soluționare a recursului declarat de pârâta I.M., împotriva deciziei civile nr. 225/C din 17 martie 2004 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel Constanța.

Așa fiind, în temeiul art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 493 din 10 noiembrie 2004, va scoate cauza de pe rol și va trimite dosarul prin declinare de competență la Curtea de Apel Constanța.

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E:

În temeiul art. II alin. (3) din Legea nr. 493/2004, scoate cauza de pe rol și trimite dosarul, prin declinare de competență, la Curtea de Apel Constanța.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 2 iunie 2005.