Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_237643 AI generated

Withdrawal of prosecutor-filed protection order request allowed by victim

Case Number ICCJ_237643
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the joined referrals from two courts and ruled, in a preliminary ruling on a question of law, that a victim may withdraw a request for a protection order where that request was filed by a prosecutor on the victim's behalf under art. 40(3)(a) or art. 34(6) of Law No. 217/2003. The ruling interprets art. 406 of the Civil Procedure Code in conjunction with arts. 2(2), 92(1), and 93, and in light of art. I(2) of Law No. 232/2025, and is binding under art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court thus resolved a conflict concerning the victim's procedural autonomy in protection-order proceedings initiated by a prosecutor, holding that the victim's withdrawal is permissible despite the prosecutor's role as filer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 34 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 217/2003; Withdrawal of prosecutor-filed protection order request allowed by victim: Victima poate renunța la judecarea cererii de emitere a unui ordin de protecție, atunci când cererea este introdusă de către procuror în numele victimei, conform art. 40 alin. (3) lit. a) sau art. 34 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 217/2003.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code procedural orders preliminary ruling procedure withdrawal of criminal complaint e-justice prosecutorial discretion
AI generated
ICCJ_192489
Prosecutor's withdrawal of cassation appeal against termination of proceedings for criminal offenses and property damage
ICCJ_47736
Challenging Prosecutor's Withdrawal from Criminal Investigation: Appeal Partially Allowed, Order Quashed and Remanded for Review of Late-Filed Complaint
ICCJ_121978
Withdrawal of complaint against prosecutor’s refusal to institute criminal proceedings
ICCJ_213727
Domestic violence prosecution: whether criminal action initiated on a valid preliminary complaint precludes ex officio characterization and prosecutor oversight of withdrawal
ICCJ_99304
Withdrawal of complaint against prosecutor's refusal to initiate criminal proceedings accepted; judicial costs imposed on petitioner

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 82 Dosar nr. 478/1/2026

Ședința din 22 iunie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Iaşi – Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 46054/245/2025 şi de Tribunalul Sibiu – Secția I civilă în dosarul nr. 2427/306/2026.

În interpretarea şi aplicarea art. 406 din Codul de procedură civilă coroborat cu art. 2 alin. (2), art. 92 alin. (1) şi art. 93 din Codul de procedură civilă şi prin raportare la art. I pct. 2 din Legea nr. 232/2025, stabilește că:

Victima poate renunța la judecarea cererii de emitere a unui ordin de protecție, atunci când cererea este introdusă de către procuror în numele victimei, conform art. 40 alin. (3) lit. a) sau art. 34 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 217/2003.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 22 iunie 2026.