Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_237641 AI generated

Admissibility of referral regarding inclusion of penitentiary allowance in judge's rest leave indemnity calculation

Case Number ICCJ_237641
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Alba Tribunal, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the case without a definitive supreme court interpretation. The dispute concerned whether a 20% penitentiary allowance, established under the salary framework law and a specific ministry order, constitutes a permanent bonus to be included in the calculation of rest leave indemnity during a period of delegation for judges and prosecutors. The procedural ruling was based on Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility conditions for such constitutional-level legal referrals, resulting in no substantive change to the status of the underlying litigation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referral regarding inclusion of penitentiary allowance in judge's rest leave indemnity calculation: The dispute concerned whether a 20% penitentiary allowance, established under the salary framework law and a specific ministry order, constitutes a permanent bonus to be included in the calculation of rest leave indemnity during a period of delegation for judges and prosecutors. The procedural ruling was based on Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility conditions for such constitutional-level legal referrals, resulting in no substantive change to the status of the underlying litigation.

Keywords

AI generated
penitentiary staff judicial law calculation of salary rest period referral order preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the basis for the binding effect of the decision in the dispositive.
AI generated
ICCJ_219284
Inclusion of Surcharges and Allowances in Paid Leave Indemnity Calculations for Prison and Educational Staff
ICCJ_219265
Admissibility of preliminary ruling referral on whether food benefits are included in the base for recalculating public officials' leave allowances.
ICCJ_228145
Admissibility of preliminary reference on inclusion of night, isolation, and risk premiums in leave benefits for penitentiary police officials
ICCJ_224985
Admissibility of referral on whether food allowances constitute part of the base for calculating sick leave, study leave, parental leave, and supplementary days off
ICCJ_220640
Admissibility of referral on calculation of leadership allowance under public sector salary framework law

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the basis for the binding effect of the decision in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 80 Dosar nr. 720/1/2026

Ședința din 22 iunie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Alba-Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 1490/107/2025, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă sporul de penitenciar de 20%, prevăzut de art. 13 din capitolul VIII, secţiunea a 2-a din anexa nr. V la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare şi de art. 1 alin. (1) şi (2) din Ordinul ministrului justiţiei nr. 2830/C/2017, are natura unui spor permanent ce trebuie luat în considerare la calculul indemnizaţiei concediului de odihnă, cuvenită pentru perioada aferentă duratei delegării, în condiţiile art. 6 din Regulamentul privind concediile judecătorilor şi procurorilor, aprobat prin Hotărârea Consiliului Superior al Magistraturii nr. 325/2005.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 22 iunie 2026.