Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_237637 AI generated

Timing of pension resumption after claimant-requested suspension without employment termination under Law 360/2023

Case Number ICCJ_237637
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the referral submitted by the Caraș-Severin Tribunal as inadmissible, thereby leaving the lower court without the requested preliminary ruling and allowing the proceedings to continue based on existing interpretations. The dispute concerned the precise moment for resuming pension payments after a suspension requested by the claimant, in a scenario where the employment relationship had not terminated following the issuance of a pension decision based on the retirement age limit. The case involved the interpretation of Article 102(1)(k) and Article 101(5) of Law No. 360/2023 regarding the public pension system, considered in light of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/2021 and the High Court's prior Decision No. 91/2024, with the court's rejection governed by the procedural rules of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 101 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 360/2023, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Timing of pension resumption after claimant-requested suspension without employment termination under Law 360/2023: The dispute concerned the precise moment for resuming pension payments after a suspension requested by the claimant, in a scenario where the employment relationship had not terminated following the issuance of a pension decision based on the retirement age limit. The case involved the interpretation of Article 102(1)(k) and Article 101(5) of Law No. 360/2023 regarding the public pension system, considered in light of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/2021 and the High Court's prior Decision No. 91/2024, with the court's rejection governed by the procedural rules of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of pension termination of proceedings public employment law preliminary decision article of civil procedure decisions on the retirement pension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 101 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 360/2023
k) şi art. 101 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 360/2023 privind sistemul public de pensii, raportat la Decizia Curţii Constituţionale nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 72/2026
Pension suspension during continued public service: retroactive reinstatement vs. termination of civil service by pension decision
ICCJ_235035
Timing of pension resumption and suspension for female public officials opting for male retirement age
Decizia nr. 2338/2015
Suspension pending preliminary ruling upheld in pension recalculation appeal.
Decizia nr. 55/2018
Timing of suspension and recovery of early pension benefits upon exceeding the annual income threshold under the Public Pensions System Law
Decizia nr. 102/2025
Pension referral held inadmissible; suspension lifted as public-funds precondition unmet.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 76 Dosar nr. 640/1/2026

Ședința din 22 iunie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Caraş Severin - Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 1220/115/2025, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

În interpretarea art. 102 alin. (1) lit. k) şi art. 101 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 360/2023 privind sistemul public de pensii, raportat la Decizia Curţii Constituţionale nr. 112 din 23 februarie 2021, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I nr. 353 din 7 aprilie 2021 şi la Decizia Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept nr. 91 din 25 noiembrie 2024, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I nr. 77 din 29 ianuarie 2025, care este momentul reluării plății pensiei după suspendarea acesteia la cererea reclamantei, în situația în care nu a avut loc încetarea raportului de muncă după emiterea deciziei de pensie pentru limită de vârstă.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 22 iunie 2026.