Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2091/2025 AI generated

Appeal against appellate ruling deemed inadmissible as unavailable remedy, final decision upheld.

Case Number Decizia nr. 2091/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the claimant's appeal against the appellate court's decision no. 501 of 23 May 2024, which had already annulled the claimant's earlier appeal as unstamped; the appellate decision thus remains in force. The underlying dispute involved the claimant challenging administrative acts issued by a local council; procedurally, the claimant attempted an appeal against a ruling rendered in a prior appeal, invoking ordinary appellate rules. The court held that under Articles 457, 483(1), and 634(5) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, a decision rendered in an appeal is final and not subject to further appeal, as the law only permits appeals against judgments given in first instance without right of appeal or in cases expressly provided by law; therefore, the remedy was unavailable and the appeal was rejected as inadmissible, being final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 248 C. proc. civ, art. 457 C. proc. civ, art. 483 alin. (1) din C. proc. civ, art. 634 alin. (5) din C. proc. civ; Appeal against appellate ruling deemed inadmissible as unavailable remedy, final decision upheld: 501 of 23 May 2024, which had already annulled the claimant's earlier appeal as unstamped; the appellate decision thus remains in force. The underlying dispute involved the claimant challenging administrative acts issued by a local council; procedurally, the claimant attempted an appeal against a ruling rendered in a prior appeal, invoking ordinary appellate rules. The court held that under Articles 457, 483(1), and 634(5) of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, a decision rendered in an appeal is final and not subject to further appeal, as the law only permits appeals against judgments given in first instance without right of appeal or in cases expressly provided by law; therefore, the remedy was unavailable and the appeal was rejected as inadmissible, being final.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative dismissal appealability of remand decision civil judgment right to remain established right rules of procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 248 C. proc. civ
494 raportat la art. 248 C. proc. civ., regularitatea învestirii sale cu calea de atac de faţă, Înalta Curte constată că aceasta nu este prevăzută de lege.
art. 457 C. proc. civ
Used to establish that the decision is subject only to the legal remedies provided by law, supporting the finding that the appeal is inadmissible.
art. 483 alin. (1) din C. proc. civ
Cited to define which decisions are subject to appeal, showing that the challenged decision does not fall within those categories.
art. 634 alin. (5) din C. proc. civ
Used to establish that the decision is definitive, as it was rendered in an appeal, further supporting inadmissibility.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2046/2025
Appeal against Court of Appeal ruling held inadmissible for lack of statutory remedy.
Decizia nr. 915/2019
Appeal against final enforcement ruling held inadmissible for lack of statutory remedy.
Decizia nr. 4092/2018
Claimant's appeal against final appellate ruling held inadmissible for lack of legal remedy.
Decizia nr. 918/2015
Appeal against denial of review of final appellate ruling inadmissible for lack of appealable decision.
Decizia nr. 354/2013
Inadmissibility of appeal against final appellate decision under legalitity of judicial remedies

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 457 C. proc. civ.

Used to establish that the decision is subject only to the legal remedies provided by law, supporting the finding that the appeal is inadmissible.

art. 483 alin. (1) din C. proc. civ.

Cited to define which decisions are subject to appeal, showing that the challenged decision does not fall within those categories.

art. 634 alin. (5) din C. proc. civ.

Used to establish that the decision is definitive, as it was rendered in an appeal, further supporting inadmissibility.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Şedinţa publică din data de 10 aprilie 2025

Asupra recursului de faţă,

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

1. Circumstanţele cauzei. Hotărârea ce face obiectul prezentei căi de atac

Prin decizia civilă nr. 501 din 23 mai 2024, Curtea de Apel Constanţa, secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal a admis excepţia netimbrării şi a anulat recursul declarat de reclamantul A. împotriva încheierii nr. 24/02.02.2024, pronunţată de Tribunalul Constanţa în dosarul nr. x/2024, ca netimbrat.

2. Calea de atac exercitată

Împotriva acestei decizii, recurentul A. a formulat recurs, înregistrat pe rolul Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie la 17.06.2024.

3. Apărările formulate

3.1. Intimatul-pârât Consiliul Local Sector 2 a depus la dosar note de şedinţă, prin care a invocat excepţia inadmisibilităţii şi excepţia netimbrării recursului.

4. Decizia instanţei de recurs

Analizând, cu prioritate, în condiţiile art. 494 raportat la art. 248 C. proc. civ., regularitatea învestirii sale cu calea de atac de faţă, Înalta Curte constată că aceasta nu este prevăzută de lege.

Potrivit art. 457 C. proc. civ., hotărârea judecătorească este supusă numai căilor de atac prevăzute de lege, în condiţiile şi termenele stabilite de aceasta.

Conform art. 483 alin. (1) din C. proc. civ., sunt supuse recursului "hotărârile date în apel, fără drept de apel, precum şi alte hotărâri în cazurile exprese prevăzute de lege".

Prevederile art. 634 alin. (5) din C. proc. civ. arată că sunt hotărâri definitive hotărârile date în recurs, chiar dacă prin acestea s-a soluţionat fondul pricinii.

În cauză, recurentul A. a formulat recurs împotriva unei decizii pronunţate în soluţionarea unui recurs, decizie care este definitivă.

Prin urmare, instanţa de control judiciar constată că recurentul nu are deschisă calea de atac exercitată împotriva deciziei atacate, care nu face parte din categoria celor supuse recursului, având caracter definitiv.

Pentru considerentele expuse şi în temeiul dispoziţiilor anterior citate, Înalta Curte va respinge recursul, ca inadmisibil.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge recursul formulat de reclamantul A. împotriva deciziei nr. 501 din 23 mai 2024 a Curţii de Apel Constanţa, secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, ca inadmisibil.

Definitivă.

Pronunţată astăzi, 10 aprilie 2025, prin punerea soluţiei la dispoziţia părţilor prin mijlocirea grefei instanţei.