Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_235036 AI generated

Preliminary ruling referral on protection orders against legally incapacitated persons inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_235036
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for the preliminary ruling on questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Brăila Tribunal (Civil Section I) in Case No. 374/196/2026, thereby refusing to answer the two questions posed regarding the interpretation of Article 12(1) of Law No. 26/2024 on protection orders. The referral sought to clarify whether the phrase "from another person" in that provision could include persons subject to the guardianship measure of special tutelage (i.e., persons lacking legal capacity), and, if so, under what conditions a protection order could be issued against such a person; because the referral was declared inadmissible, no substantive guidance was given and the lower court's query stands unresolved. The decision was rendered mandatory under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, meaning the ruling binds future courts on the admissibility point only. The legal basis for the dismissal lies in the procedural rules governing the preliminary ruling mechanism, specifically the requirement that a referral must meet admissibility criteria before the court can address the merits of the interpretive questions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 12 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 26/2024, Art. 521 alin. (3) C. pr. civ; Preliminary ruling referral on protection orders against legally incapacitated persons inadmissible: 374/196/2026, thereby refusing to answer the two questions posed regarding the interpretation of Article 12(1) of Law No. 26/2024 on protection orders. The referral sought to clarify whether the phrase "from another person" in that provision could include persons subject to the guardianship measure of special tutelage (i.e., persons lacking legal capacity), and, if so, under what conditions a protection order could be issued against such a person; because the referral was declared inadmissible, no substantive guidance was given and the lower court's query stands unresolved. The decision was rendered mandatory under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, meaning the ruling binds future courts on the admissibility point only. The legal basis for the dismissal lies in the procedural rules governing the preliminary ruling mechanism, specifically the requirement that a referral must meet admissibility criteria before the court can address the merits of the interpretive questions.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision referral order legal protection legal capacity Civil Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 12 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 26/2024
Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 12 alin.
Art. 521 alin. (3) C. pr. civ
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for declaring the referral binding.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) C. pr. civ.

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for declaring the referral binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 73 Dosar nr. 219/1/2026

Ședința din 18 mai 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Brăila - Secţia I civilă, în Dosarul nr. 374/196/2026, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarelor chestiuni de drept:

Interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 12 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 26/2024 privind ordinul de protecție, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, respectiv dacă sintagma „din partea unei alte persoane”, utilizată de textul de lege, poate viza și persoane față de care a fost instituită măsura de ocrotire a tutelei speciale, respectiv persoane lipsite de capacitate de exercițiu?

În caz afirmativ, în ce condiții poate fi emis un ordin de protecție față de o asemenea persoană?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 18 mai 2026.