Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_234973 AI generated

Admissibility of referring to the uniformity jurisdiction the challenge of prescribed salary recalculations under Framework Law No. 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_234973
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, thereby denying the requesting court a binding jurisprudential resolution on the disputed legal issue. The case concerned an employment dispute involving the recalculation of public sector salaries under Framework Law No. 153/2017, specifically whether an undisputed salary entitlement could be challenged via a common law action for recalculation beyond the period in which it was originally granted. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the inadmissibility of the reference under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the requirements for submitting questions of law to the unified jurisdiction plenary, meaning the higher court did not rule on the substantive merits of the prescription or recalculation argument.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referring to the uniformity jurisdiction the challenge of prescribed salary recalculations under Framework Law No. 153/2017: The case concerned an employment dispute involving the recalculation of public sector salaries under Framework Law No. 153/2017, specifically whether an undisputed salary entitlement could be challenged via a common law action for recalculation beyond the period in which it was originally granted. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the inadmissibility of the reference under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the requirements for submitting questions of law to the unified jurisdiction plenary, meaning the higher court did not rule on the substantive merits of the prescription or recalculation argument.

Keywords

AI generated
salary recalculation Civil Procedure Code public employment law reference for a preliminary ruling labor disputes employment reference

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the dismissal of the reference as inadmissible is a binding obligation for the courts involved.
AI generated
ICCJ_178561
Admissibility of judicial reference on public sector wage calculation under Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_230721
Preliminary reference on public sector salary equality under Framework Law 153/2017 dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_225827
Preliminary reference on salary recalculation for civil servants following transfer of the National Administration of State Reserves to government subordination
Decizia nr. 677/2021
Inadmissibility of salary recalculation claim due to non-fulfillment of pre-litigation objection procedure under civil service law
ICCJ_220712
Admissibility of preliminary reference on equal pay for identical work in public sector employment under Framework Law 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the dismissal of the reference as inadmissible is a binding obligation for the courts involved.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 56 Dosar nr. 2584/1/2025

Ședința din 20 aprilie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel București - Secția a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă și asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 1243/87/2024, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile prin care să dea o rezolvare de principiu asupra următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă modalitatea de calcul al unui drept prevăzut şi acordat potrivit Legii-cadru nr.153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, necontestată în condițiile art. 37 din aceeaşi lege, poate fi repusă în discuţie oricând pe calea unei acţiuni de drept comun tinzând la recalcularea respectivului drept pentru perioada în care a fost acordat, exercitată în interiorul termenului general de prescripţie faţă de data stabilirii dreptului sau chiar în afara lui, dacă persoana interesată nu a invocat prescripţia.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 20 aprilie 2026.