Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_234611 AI generated

Inadmissibility of referral on whether reversed pension debts fall under statutory debt relief provisions

Case Number ICCJ_234611
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral of a question of law submitted by the Timișoara Court of Appeal, thereby leaving the lower court's procedural path unaffected without resolving the substantive merits. The dispute concerned a labor and social security litigation regarding whether debts consisting of pension sums collected pursuant to judicial decisions that were subsequently annulled on appeal fell within the scope of debt relief provisions. The decisive legal issue involved the interpretation and application of Articles 1 and 2 of Law No. 125/2014 regarding debt relief, as amended by Law No. 285/2024, read in conjunction with the final provisions of that 2024 amendment, specifically focusing on the eligibility of such reversed debts for statutory scutirea de plată.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2 din Legea nr. 125/2014, art. 1 din Legea nr. 285/2024, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of referral on whether reversed pension debts fall under statutory debt relief provisions: The dispute concerned a labor and social security litigation regarding whether debts consisting of pension sums collected pursuant to judicial decisions that were subsequently annulled on appeal fell within the scope of debt relief provisions. The decisive legal issue involved the interpretation and application of Articles 1 and 2 of Law No. 125/2014 regarding debt relief, as amended by Law No. 285/2024, read in conjunction with the final provisions of that 2024 amendment, specifically focusing on the eligibility of such reversed debts for statutory scutirea de plată.

Keywords

AI generated
debt relief provisions on pensions social security disputes social security issue of securities reinstatement of disability pension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2 din Legea nr. 125/2014
1 şi art. 2 din Legea nr. 125/2014 privind scutirea de plată a unor debite provenite din pensii, aşa cum au fost modificate prin art.
art. 1 din Legea nr. 285/2024
125/2014 privind scutirea de plată a unor debite provenite din pensii, aşa cum au fost modificate prin art. 1 din Legea nr. 285/2024, coroborat cu art.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and obligatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 49/2026
Pension-debt repayment exemption referral rejected as inadmissible for lack of genuine legal difficulty.
ICCJ_172362
Admissibility of referral on pension debt waiver scope following abrogation of methodological norms
ICCJ_223193
Inadmissibility of referrals on statutory interest and inflation adjustment for back-payments of parliamentary retirement allowances.
Decizia nr. 28/2019
Admissibility of referral on service pension applicability to contributory pensioners under transitional norms
Decizia nr. 279/2025
Pension revision referral dismissed as inadmissible for failing to specify legal provisions and case relevance

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 49 Dosar nr. 408/1/2026

Ședința din 23 martie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Timişoara – Secţia litigii de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 3516/30/2022, privind lămurirea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 1 şi art. 2 din Legea nr. 125/2014 privind scutirea de plată a unor debite provenite din pensii, aşa cum au fost modificate prin art. 1 din Legea nr. 285/2024, coroborat cu art. III din Legea nr. 285/2024, debitele reprezentând sume încasate cu titlu de pensie în baza unor hotărâri judecătoreşti desfiinţate în căile de atac, fac obiectul scutirii de plată”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 23 martie 2026.