Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_234605 AI generated

Land title for construction land: Intravilan requirement and timing of agricultural registration proof under Land Law Art. 24(3)

Case Number ICCJ_234605
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Olt County Court regarding the interpretation of Article 24(3) and 24(3)(b) of Law No. 18/1991 on Land Property, thereby leaving the lower court to proceed without a binding legal clarification from the supreme instance. The dispute concerned the requirements for issuing property titles for land associated with construction, specifically whether the land must be located within the village's urban limit rather than the extra-urban area, and whether proof of the construction's registration in the agricultural register must be maintained for the entire existence of the structure or only at the time the property title request was filed. No substantive interpretation of these statutory provisions was provided, as the case was resolved on procedural admissibility grounds under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Land title for construction land: Intravilan requirement and timing of agricultural registration proof under Land Law Art. 24(3): 18/1991 on Land Property, thereby leaving the lower court to proceed without a binding legal clarification from the supreme instance. The dispute concerned the requirements for issuing property titles for land associated with construction, specifically whether the land must be located within the village's urban limit rather than the extra-urban area, and whether proof of the construction's registration in the agricultural register must be maintained for the entire existence of the structure or only at the time the property title request was filed. No substantive interpretation of these statutory provisions was provided, as the case was resolved on procedural admissibility grounds under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
land law agricultural land statutory requirement Civil Procedure Code civil register registration procedure
AI generated
Decizia nr. 43/2026
Scope of Art. 24(3) of Law 18/1991: Intravilan requirement and agricultural register registration timing for ownership of land attached to former cooperative buildings
Decizia nr. 4692/2005
Agricultural land ownership claim: sufficiency of County Commission title versus reconstitution certificate for proof of property rights
Decizia nr. 3964/2012
Validity of title for alienation of state-owned agricultural property and requirement of ownership certificate under Government Decision No. 834/1991.
Decizia nr. 1498/2005
Challenge to agricultural land property title certificate: appeal allowed, judgment quashed and case remanded for verification of preliminary procedure and legal basis
Decizia nr. 562/2004
Validity of state-issued property titles for expropriated land: retrocession rights unaffected by reclassification from agricultural to building use

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 43 Dosar nr. 1976/1/2025

Ședința din 23 martie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Olt - Secția I civilă, în Dosarul nr. 165/311/2024, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarelor chestiuni de drept:

1. Dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 24 alin. (3) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, terenul aferent construcţiilor la care se referă acest text, teren având categoria de curţi-construcţii, este obligatoriu să fie situat în intravilanul localității sau poate fi situat şi în extravilanul localității?

2. Dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 24 alin. (3) lit. b) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, condiţia privind dovada înregistrării construcţiei în registrul agricol trebuie îndeplinită pe toată durata de existenţă a respectivei construcţii sau doar la momentul formulării cererii de emitere a titlului de proprietate privind constituirea dreptului de proprietate pentru terenurile aferente acestor construcţii?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 23 martie 2026.