Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_232860 AI generated

Unitary interpretation of "special working conditions" for public pensions: only periods in Work Group I or II qualify under Law 263/2010

Case Number ICCJ_232860
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the public interest filed by the Presiding Council of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal, establishing a mandatory unitary interpretation for nationwide application. The dispute concerned the legal classification of working periods for pension rights under the public pension system, specifically addressing whether time served in special working groups qualifies as special conditions for pension calculation purposes. The Court ruled that, in the unitary application of Article 30(1)(i) and (44) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified system of public pensions, the period "asimilated" to special working conditions is exclusively the time during which an employee performed activities in Work Group I and/or Work Group II, thereby clarifying the statutory scope of such favorable pension regimes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă; Unitary interpretation of "special working conditions" for public pensions: only periods in Work Group I or II qualify under Law 263/2010: The dispute concerned the legal classification of working periods for pension rights under the public pension system, specifically addressing whether time served in special working groups qualifies as special conditions for pension calculation purposes. The Court ruled that, in the unitary application of Article 30(1)(i) and (44) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified system of public pensions, the period "asimilated" to special working conditions is exclusively the time during which an employee performed activities in Work Group I and/or Work Group II, thereby clarifying the statutory scope of such favorable pension regimes.

Keywords

AI generated
pension rights working conditions legal working time right to work established right legal systems

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory and binding nature of the decision issued in the appeal in the interest of the law.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory and binding nature of the decision issued in the appeal in the interest of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 5 Dosar nr. 2460/1/2025

Şedinţa din 23 februarie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curții de Apel Alba Iulia și, în consecință, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispozițiilor art. 30 alin. (1) lit. i) şi alin. (44) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, este asimilată condițiilor speciale de muncă exclusiv perioada în care un salariat şi-a desfăşurat activitatea în grupa I şi/sau a II-a de muncă.

Obligatorie, conform art. 517 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 23 februarie 2026.