Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_232213 AI generated

Mandatory pre-litigation complaint to public institution head required before challenging property evaluation report

Case Number ICCJ_232213
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting as the body for resolving questions of law, admitted the referral from the Bacău Court of Appeal and issued a binding interpretation that a complaint filed with the head of a public institution during the evaluation procedure is a mandatory pre-litigation step before filing an action to annul an evaluation report. The dispute concerned the procedural prerequisites for challenging administrative property evaluations under the Administrative Code, specifically whether internal grievance mechanisms must be exhausted before judicial intervention. Relying on Article 20 of Annex 6 to Emergency Government Order No. 57/2019 (Administrative Code) in conjunction with Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, the court established that this internal appeal constitutes a compulsory prior procedure, thereby defining the admissibility requirements for subsequent civil litigation regarding public asset valuations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Mandatory pre-litigation complaint to public institution head required before challenging property evaluation report: The dispute concerned the procedural prerequisites for challenging administrative property evaluations under the Administrative Code, specifically whether internal grievance mechanisms must be exhausted before judicial intervention. Relying on Article 20 of Annex 6 to Emergency Government Order No. 57/2019 (Administrative Code) in conjunction with Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, the court established that this internal appeal constitutes a compulsory prior procedure, thereby defining the admissibility requirements for subsequent civil litigation regarding public asset valuations.

Keywords

AI generated
prior administrative complaint civil litigation procedure procedural requirement public-law institution law of obligations public property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule applied to classify the internal complaint as an obligatory procedural requirement.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 20 din Anexa 6 din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 57/2019

Main ground for the verdict, establishing that the complaint to the head of the public institution is a mandatory pre-litigation step.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule applied to classify the internal complaint as an obligatory procedural requirement.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 25 Dosar nr. 1916/1/2025

Ședința din 26 ianuarie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bacău - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal în dosarul nr. 1653/110/2024, şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 20 din Anexa 6 din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, contestaţia formulată în cadrul procedurii de evaluare, la conducătorul instituţiei publice, reprezintă o procedură prealabilă obligatorie anterior sesizării instanţei de judecată cu o acţiune în anularea raportului de evaluare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 26 ianuarie 2026.