Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_232207 AI generated

Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on whether special-condition service in internal affairs can reduce public pension retirement age

Case Number ICCJ_232207
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling on a question of law, thereby leaving the procedural stance of the Court of Appeal in the underlying civil case unchanged. The dispute concerned whether a military pensioner from the Ministry of Internal Affairs could utilize service years accrued under special conditions after January 1, 2016, to reduce the standard retirement age within the public pension system under Law No. 263/2010, or whether such periods could only be credited to the specific Ministry of Internal Affairs pension scheme. The court’s decision resolved the issue solely on procedural admissibility grounds, without addressing the substantive interpretation of Article 26 of Law No. 223/2015 and Article 192 of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the portability of special-condition service records for pension age reduction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 26 din Legea nr. 223/2015, art. 192 din Legea nr. 263/2010, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on whether special-condition service in internal affairs can reduce public pension retirement age: The dispute concerned whether a military pensioner from the Ministry of Internal Affairs could utilize service years accrued under special conditions after January 1, 2016, to reduce the standard retirement age within the public pension system under Law No. 263/2010, or whether such periods could only be credited to the specific Ministry of Internal Affairs pension scheme. The court’s decision resolved the issue solely on procedural admissibility grounds, without addressing the substantive interpretation of Article 26 of Law No. 223/2015 and Article 192 of Law No. 263/2010 regarding the portability of special-condition service records for pension age reduction.

Keywords

AI generated
retirement conditions pension scheme preliminary decision grounds for cassation civil service retirement credit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 26 din Legea nr. 223/2015
„În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 26 din Legea nr. 223/2015 şi ale art.
art. 192 din Legea nr. 263/2010
223/2015 şi ale art. 192 din Legea nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 16/2024
Military pension service in special conditions: non-applicability of public system reduced retirement age under Law 263/2010
ICCJ_225011
Pension special-condition question held inadmissible for preliminary ruling
ICCJ_178555
Pension age reduction cumulation dispute declared inadmissible for lack of established non-uniform practice
Decizia nr. 176/2025
Simultaneous pension claim and continued public service until male retirement age: inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on clear administrative code provisions
ICCJ_226629
Interpretation of "standard age" in pension liability under the Administrative Code

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 20 Dosar nr. 1476/1/2025

Ședința din 26 ianuarie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti – Secţia I civilă, în Dosarul nr. 3544/109/2022, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 26 din Legea nr. 223/2015 şi ale art. 192 din Legea nr. 263/2010, după data de 1 ianuarie 2016, stagiul de cotizare realizat în condiţii speciale, în sistemul Ministerului Afacerilor Interne, de către o persoană care a fost cadru militar în acest sistem, poate fi valorificat în sistemul public de pensii în vederea reducerii vârstei standard de pensionare prevăzute de Legea nr. 263/2010 la deschiderea drepturilor sale de pensie din sistemul public sau acesta poate fi valorificat numai în sistemul de pensii al Ministerului Afacerilor Interne?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 26 ianuarie 2026.