Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_232201 AI generated

Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on IT specialists' salary coefficients under Law-No. 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_232201
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by a civil tribunal, thereby leaving the lower court's proceedings to continue without a binding resolution from the supreme jurisdiction. The dispute concerned the calculation of salary rights for IT specialists employed at courts of appeal, specifically whether the pension length coefficient should be calculated based on the effective total length of service in the specialty, as defined in the Note to Chapter II of Annex No. V to Law-No. 153/2017, following the suspension of the legal applicability of that Annex. The case centers on the principles of equality and non-discrimination under Article 6(1) of Law-No. 153/2017 regarding public sector remuneration, with the decisive procedural basis being the inadmissibility of the preliminary reference under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on IT specialists' salary coefficients under Law-No. 153/2017: The dispute concerned the calculation of salary rights for IT specialists employed at courts of appeal, specifically whether the pension length coefficient should be calculated based on the effective total length of service in the specialty, as defined in the Note to Chapter II of Annex No. V to Law-No. 153/2017, following the suspension of the legal applicability of that Annex. The case centers on the principles of equality and non-discrimination under Article 6(1) of Law-No. 153/2017 regarding public sector remuneration, with the decisive procedural basis being the inadmissibility of the preliminary reference under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling calculation of salary Civil Procedure Code procedural rights pension rights basis of calculation
AI generated
ICCJ_222082
Inadmissibility of reference for preliminary ruling on salary calculation for public employees following statutory transformation of contractual posts
ICCJ_226582
Preliminary salary-calculation referral inadmissible; lower court decision stands.
ICCJ_156419
Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on 15% disability salary supplement under Law 153/2017 and Government Decision 751/2018
ICCJ_225071
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on transitional salary calculation under Law 153/2017 where similar function in payment exists
ICCJ_220674
Inadmissibility of preliminary referrals on compensatory salary gaps under Law 153/2017 for the Justice occupational family

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory nature of the resolution requested by the lower court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 14 Dosar nr. 2163/1/2025

Ședința din 26 ianuarie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Alba – Secţia I Civilă, în dosarul nr. 4617/107/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile prin care să dea o rezolvare de principiu asupra chestiunii de drept:

Calcularea drepturilor salariale ale specialiștilor IT din cadrul curților de apel, prin raportare la vechimea efectivă totală în specialitate a specialiștilor IT, raportat la principiile egalității şi nediscriminării reglementate de art. 6 alin. (1) din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările și completările ulterioare, respectiv:

Dacă, subsecvent reținerii aplicabilității anexei nr. V la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 în stabilirea drepturilor salariale cuvenite specialiștilor IT din cadrul curților de apel, se aplică coeficientul de vechime în funcție prin raportare la vechimea efectivă în specialitatea deținută, definită în conformitate cu Nota la Capitolul II anexa nr. V la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 26 ianuarie 2026.