Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_232198 AI generated

Admissibility of reference for preliminary ruling on base salary calculation for public officials under Emergency Government Ordinance 128/2023

Case Number ICCJ_232198
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible a reference for a preliminary ruling on a point of law submitted by the Iași County Court, meaning the lower court's reference is dismissed and the case remains with the referring court to decide on the merits. The dispute concerned the correct base salary for calculating wage differences for a public official in a county pension agency, specifically whether the calculation must be based on the corresponding state salary scale from the National Public Pensions Agency. The key legal issue involved the interpretation of Article V of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 128/2023, which regulated salary measures for personnel in the education and other budgetary sectors, but the admissibility of the reference under the relevant procedural codes was deemed insufficient.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of reference for preliminary ruling on base salary calculation for public officials under Emergency Government Ordinance 128/2023: The dispute concerned the correct base salary for calculating wage differences for a public official in a county pension agency, specifically whether the calculation must be based on the corresponding state salary scale from the National Public Pensions Agency. The key legal issue involved the interpretation of Article V of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 128/2023, which regulated salary measures for personnel in the education and other budgetary sectors, but the admissibility of the reference under the relevant procedural codes was deemed insufficient.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling calculation of salary emergency government ordinance procedural orders public officials interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the court's decision is mandatory for the referring court.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the court's decision is mandatory for the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 11 Dosar nr. 2045/1/2025

Ședința din 26 ianuarie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Iași – Secţia a II-a civilă, contencios administrativ și fiscal, în dosarul nr. 1636/99/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile prin care să dea o rezolvare de principiu asupra următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă în interpretarea art. V din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 128/2023 pentru unele măsuri referitoare la salarizarea personalului din învăţământ şi alte sectoare de activitate bugetară, pentru un funcționar public din cadrul Casei Județene de Pensii Iași, având funcția publică de Șef Serviciu Comunicare și Relații Publice, Informatică, Resurse Umane, diferențele salariale acordate ar trebui să aibă în vedere, ca bază de calcul, valoarea salariului funcției de stat corespunzătoare din structura Casei Naționale de Pensii Publice.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 26 ianuarie 2026.