Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_232191 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary reference on alleged occupational discrimination in social security contributions and pension options for military prosecutors

Case Number ICCJ_232191
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference submitted by the Bucharest District Court regarding a labor dispute, leaving the lower court to proceed without a definitive ruling from the supreme court on the specific legal question. The case centered on whether a military prosecutor was unlawfully discriminated against within the judicial corps by the automatic redirection of a 25% social security contribution from their gross monthly income to the state budget under the Military State Pensions Law, which allegedly deprived them of the right to choose between a service pension in the "Justice" occupational system, a contribution-based pension, or private pension fund contributions. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which rendered the request for a preliminary ruling on this interpretation of pension and social insurance statutes inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 31 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 223/2015, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary reference on alleged occupational discrimination in social security contributions and pension options for military prosecutors: The case centered on whether a military prosecutor was unlawfully discriminated against within the judicial corps by the automatic redirection of a 25% social security contribution from their gross monthly income to the state budget under the Military State Pensions Law, which allegedly deprived them of the right to choose between a service pension in the "Justice" occupational system, a contribution-based pension, or private pension fund contributions. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which rendered the request for a preliminary ruling on this interpretation of pension and social insurance statutes inadmissible.

Keywords

AI generated
occupational pension rights preliminary decision in social insurance reference for a preliminary ruling social security contributions military personnel procedural rights
AI generated
ICCJ_234589
Preliminary ruling on admissibility: lack of a genuine legal issue in referral concerning discriminatory pension contributions for military prosecutors
ICCJ_228040
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on inclusion of judicially awarded mobility and confidentiality allowances in military pension calculation base
ICCJ_203784
Admissibility of reference for preliminary ruling regarding recalculation of magistrate's service pension allowances under amended salary framework
ICCJ_228168
Refusal of preliminary reference on dual valuation of military service periods across public pension systems
ICCJ_217293
Preliminary referral on judicial service pension eligibility ruled inadmissible on procedural grounds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis establishing the binding nature of the court's decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 4 Dosar nr. 2231/1/2025

Ședința din 26 ianuarie 2026

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 6711/2/2024, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă reclamantul, procuror militar, este discriminat în raport cu ceilalţi membri ai corpului magistraţilor, prin virarea la bugetul de stat a contribuţiei de asigurări sociale în procent de 25%, reținută din venitul său brut lunar, potrivit art. 31 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 223/2015 privind pensiile militare de stat, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, reclamantul fiind astfel lipsit de dreptul de a opta pentru pensia de serviciu din sistemul familiei ocupaţionale de funcţii bugetare „Justiţie” sau cea pe bază de contributivitate, și totodată privat de veniturile reprezentând cota de contribuţie la Pilonul 2 de pensii private.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 26 ianuarie 2026.