Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_230718 AI generated

Limitation-period and act-of-execution preliminary questions rejected as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_230718
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie) rejected as inadmissible the joined referrals from the Dâmboviţa Tribunal (Civil Section I) in cases nos. 6.608/315/2024 and 6.607/315/2024, which sought a preliminary ruling on two issues: whether the limitation period for obtaining forced execution can be invoked via a challenge to execution under art. 715(1)(3) of the Civil Procedure Code as well as under art. 715(1)(1)-(2), interpreted with art. 711 CPC and art. 2,513 Civil Code; and whether an "act of execution" under art. 709(1)(4) CPC means any enforcement act by the bailiff or only the act effectively realizing the debtor's assets. The court declined to rule on the merits, finding the referrals inadmissible; the decision is binding under art. 521(3) CPC, meaning the lower court's questions remain unanswered and the underlying cases proceed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) C. proc. civ; Limitation-period and act-of-execution preliminary questions rejected as inadmissible: 6.608/315/2024 and 6.607/315/2024, which sought a preliminary ruling on two issues: whether the limitation period for obtaining forced execution can be invoked via a challenge to execution under art. 715(1)(3) of the Civil Procedure Code as well as under art. 715(1)(1)-(2), interpreted with art. 711 CPC and art. 2,513 Civil Code; and whether an "act of execution" under art. 709(1)(4) CPC means any enforcement act by the bailiff or only the act effectively realizing the debtor's assets. The court declined to rule on the merits, finding the referrals inadmissible; the decision is binding under art. 521(3) CPC, meaning the lower court's questions remain unanswered and the underlying cases proceed.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation periods preliminary question preliminary ruling procedure effects of a preliminary ruling Civil Procedure Code rules of procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) C. proc. civ
Basis for the binding character of the present decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 62/2023
Enforcement limitation period and interruption by prior execution proceedings
ICCJ_211988
Peremption clock for forced execution referral ruled inadmissible
Decizia nr. 684/2022
Prescription-of-execution challenge rejected as inadmissible; limitation-period claim barred from execution stage.
ICCJ_203004
Preliminary ruling referral on limitation in preliminary chamber ruled inadmissible
Decizia nr. 47/2024
Limitations on challenging fixed late-penalty interest for non-performance of personal obligations: scope of execution objection and admissibility of preliminary ruling

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) C. proc. civ.

Basis for the binding character of the present decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 416 Dosar nr. 1237/1/2025

Ședința din 24 noiembrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibile, sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Dâmboviţa - Secţia I civilă în dosarele nr. 6.608/315/2024 şi nr. 6.607/315/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarelor chestiuni de drept:

Dacă, în interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 711 din Codul de procedură civilă raportate la prevederile art. 2.513 din Codul Civil, prescripţia dreptului de a obţine executarea silită poate fi invocată atât pe calea contestaţiei la executare în condiţiile art. 715 alin. (1) pct. 3 din Codul de procedură civilă, cât şi pe calea contestaţiei la executare în condiţiile prevederilor art. 715 alin. (1), pct. 1 şi 2 din Codul de procedură civilă.

Dacă, în interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 709 alin. (1) pct. 4 din Codul de procedură civilă, actul de executare îndeplinit de executor priveşte orice act de executare silită efectuat de executor sau doar actul prin care se execută efectiv debitorul prin valorificarea bunurilor acestuia.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 24 noiembrie 2025.