Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_230692 AI generated

Suspension of military personnel's remuneration rights under repealed Article 20: preliminary referral inadmissible for lacking procedural criteria.

Case Number ICCJ_230692
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for preliminary rulings, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Ilfov Tribunal (civil section), thereby refusing to issue a preliminary ruling on whether the suspension of the exercise of the right of military personnel/police/special-status public servants under Article 20 of Annex VII to Framework Law No. 284/2010 on the unitary remuneration of publicly funded personnel still operates today or ceased upon that law's repeal. The dispute arose in a pending case concerning salary rights, and the decisive legal basis was procedural admissibility under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code; the court found the referral failed to meet the conditions for a preliminary ruling, leaving the lower court's proceedings to continue without the requested clarification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Suspension of military personnel's remuneration rights under repealed Article 20: preliminary referral inadmissible for lacking procedural criteria: 284/2010 on the unitary remuneration of publicly funded personnel still operates today or ceased upon that law's repeal. The dispute arose in a pending case concerning salary rights, and the decisive legal basis was procedural admissibility under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code; the court found the referral failed to meet the conditions for a preliminary ruling, leaving the lower court's proceedings to continue without the requested clarification.

Keywords

AI generated
military personnel rights of civil servants procedural rights preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure article of civil procedure
AI generated
ICCJ_230276
Referral for preliminary ruling on salary rights of suspended public servants inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 123/2025
Preliminary ruling referral on military overtime pay dismissed as inadmissible for lacking genuine legal difficulty
Decizia nr. 158/2025
Inadmissibility of preliminary referral: no genuine legal uncertainty regarding military overtime premiums and cessation of service
Decizia nr. 177/2025
Inadmissibility of preliminary referrals for military salary recalculation due to failure to identify a distinct legal question
ICCJ_226633
Military pension service credit dispute: referral for preliminary ruling on questions of law dismissed as inadmissible

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 402 Dosar nr. 1648/1/2025

Ședința din 17 noiembrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Ilfov – Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 1824/93/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă suspendarea exercițiului dreptului militarilor/polițiștilor/funcționarilor publici cu statut special prevăzut de art. 20 din anexa nr. VII la Legea-cadru nr. 284/2010 privind salarizarea unitară a personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, acționează şi în prezent sau a încetat la data abrogării acestui act normativ?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 17 noiembrie 2025.