Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_230686 AI generated

Inclusion of correction index pointage in pension total under Law No. 360/2023

Case Number ICCJ_230686
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the preliminary reference request submitted by the Timișoara Court of Appeal as inadmissible, thereby upholding the procedural standing of the lower court without resolving the substantive legal question. The dispute concerned the interpretation of pension entitlements and the calculation of total points under the 2023 public pensions law, specifically whether the supplementary pointage associated with the correction index, established as an irreversibly acquired right under a prior pension decision issued pursuant to the 2010 pensions law, should be included in the aggregate total. The court’s decision was grounded in the procedural requirements of Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which necessitated the rejection of the referral due to inadmissibility rather than a substantive ruling on the application of Article 144 of Law No. 360/2023.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inclusion of correction index pointage in pension total under Law No. 360/2023: The dispute concerned the interpretation of pension entitlements and the calculation of total points under the 2023 public pensions law, specifically whether the supplementary pointage associated with the correction index, established as an irreversibly acquired right under a prior pension decision issued pursuant to the 2010 pensions law, should be included in the aggregate total. The court’s decision was grounded in the procedural requirements of Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which necessitated the rejection of the referral due to inadmissibility rather than a substantive ruling on the application of Article 144 of Law No. 360/2023.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation reference for a preliminary ruling supplementary pension Civil Procedure Code procedural rights standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding effect of the Court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary reference.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory binding effect of the Court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary reference.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 396 Dosar nr. 1528/1/2025

Ședința din 17 noiembrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Timișoara – Secția litigii de muncă și asigurări sociale în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei probleme de drept:

„Dacă, în interpretarea și aplicarea art. 144 alin. (l) și (2) din Legea nr. 360/2023, la obținerea numărului total de puncte realizat, care se obține conform art. 144 alin. (2), prin însumarea punctajelor anuale, trebuia inclus și punctajul suplimentar aferent indicelui de corecție, drept câștigat irevocabil prin decizia inițială de pensionare anterioară emisă în temeiul Legii nr. 263/2010.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 17 noiembrie 2025.