Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_230275 AI generated

Admissibility of counting non-EU teaching service without reciprocal recognition agreements for salary grade under Law No. 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_230275
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the referral for the resolution of a legal question of law submitted by the Alba County Court. The dispute concerned whether the period of service as an educational staff member in a non-EU country without an agreement for the recognition of length of service with Romania could be counted toward the salary grade under Article 10 of Law No. 153/2017. The High Court’s decision is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of counting non-EU teaching service without reciprocal recognition agreements for salary grade under Law No. 153/2017: The dispute concerned whether the period of service as an educational staff member in a non-EU country without an agreement for the recognition of length of service with Romania could be counted toward the salary grade under Article 10 of Law No. 153/2017. The High Court’s decision is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code calculation of salary civil service European legal status judicial law action by staff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 378/2025
Recognizability of extra-EU teaching service for salary gradation under the Romanian public sector salary framework law
ICCJ_225021
Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible
ICCJ_219298
Admissibility of supreme court referrals on local government salary grading, minimum wage linkage, and allowance calculation methodologies under Law-Framework No. 153/2017.
ICCJ_232865
Proportional allowance question under Law No. 153/2017 referred for preliminary ruling declared inadmissible
ICCJ_178561
Admissibility of judicial reference on public sector wage calculation under Law No. 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.378 Dosar nr. 1852/1/2025

Ședința din 27 octombrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Alba – Secția I civilă, în dosarul nr. 873/107/2023*, privind lămurirea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă perioada în care o persoană cu studii superioare absolvite în România, şi-a desfășurat activitatea în calitate de cadru didactic într-o țară din afara Uniunii Europene cu care România nu are încheiat un acord/convenție/tratat cu privire la recunoașterea vechimii în muncă potrivit acestei specialități, poată fi luată în calcul pentru acordarea gradației corespunzătoare funcției, conform art. 10 din Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017, în vederea acordării drepturilor salariale, şi în raport cu această vechime?

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 27 octombrie 2025.