Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_230219 AI generated

Admissibility of reference on inclusion of OUG 27/2006 salary coefficients in service pension calculation base

Case Number ICCJ_230219
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for the unified interpretation of the law filed by the Ploiești Court of Appeal, meaning no preliminary ruling was issued and the referring court must decide the case based on existing legal principles. The dispute concerned whether salary rights established by administrative acts—specifically salary orders recognizing the use of currency valuation units and multiplication coefficients issued by the Chief Creditor under Urgency Government Ordinance No. 27/2006—constitute wage entitlements eligible for inclusion in the calculation base for service pensions without being subject to statutory caps. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal is Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the High Court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of reference on inclusion of OUG 27/2006 salary coefficients in service pension calculation base: The dispute concerned whether salary rights established by administrative acts—specifically salary orders recognizing the use of currency valuation units and multiplication coefficients issued by the Chief Creditor under Urgency Government Ordinance No. 27/2006—constitute wage entitlements eligible for inclusion in the calculation base for service pensions without being subject to statutory caps. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal is Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the High Court.

Keywords

AI generated
pension calculation reference for a preliminary ruling statutory basis Civil Procedure Code wage entitlement basis of calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory legal basis for the court's decision on the reference for the unified interpretation of the law.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory legal basis for the court's decision on the reference for the unified interpretation of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 366 Dosar nr. 744/1/2025

Ședința din 20 octombrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Ploieşti – Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 4386/120/2021, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Dacă drepturile salariale acordate prin acte administrative, ordine de salarizare prin care au fost recunoscute utilizarea V.R.S. 605,225 lei şi a coeficienţilor de multiplicare prevăzuţi de lit. A, art. 13 din Anexa la Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 27/2006 emise de ordonatorul principal de credite - Preşedintele Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie, au natura unor drepturi salariale şi pot fi avute în vedere la stabilirea bazei de calcul a pensiei de serviciu şi nu sunt plafonate”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 20 octombrie 2025.