Admissibility of reference on inclusion of OUG 27/2006 salary coefficients in service pension calculation base
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for the unified interpretation of the law filed by the Ploiești Court of Appeal, meaning no preliminary ruling was issued and the referring court must decide the case based on existing legal principles. The dispute concerned whether salary rights established by administrative acts—specifically salary orders recognizing the use of currency valuation units and multiplication coefficients issued by the Chief Creditor under Urgency Government Ordinance No. 27/2006—constitute wage entitlements eligible for inclusion in the calculation base for service pensions without being subject to statutory caps. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal is Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the High Court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of reference on inclusion of OUG 27/2006 salary coefficients in service pension calculation base: The dispute concerned whether salary rights established by administrative acts—specifically salary orders recognizing the use of currency valuation units and multiplication coefficients issued by the Chief Creditor under Urgency Government Ordinance No. 27/2006—constitute wage entitlements eligible for inclusion in the calculation base for service pensions without being subject to statutory caps. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal is Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the High Court.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory legal basis for the court's decision on the reference for the unified interpretation of the law.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 366 Dosar nr. 744/1/2025
Ședința din 20 octombrie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Ploieşti – Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 4386/120/2021, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:
„Dacă drepturile salariale acordate prin acte administrative, ordine de salarizare prin care au fost recunoscute utilizarea V.R.S. 605,225 lei şi a coeficienţilor de multiplicare prevăzuţi de lit. A, art. 13 din Anexa la Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 27/2006 emise de ordonatorul principal de credite - Preşedintele Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie, au natura unor drepturi salariale şi pot fi avute în vedere la stabilirea bazei de calcul a pensiei de serviciu şi nu sunt plafonate”.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 20 octombrie 2025.