Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_229638 AI generated

Salary increase calculation basis for pension agency civil servants under Emergency Ordinance 128/2023

Case Number ICCJ_229638
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for clarification of law submitted by the Iaș County Court, leaving the lower court's procedural position unchanged. The dispute concerned whether the 5% salary increase mandated by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 128/2023 applies to civil servants in County Pension Agencies based on the base salary in force in December 2023 or the base salary in force on January 1, 2024. The decision was grounded in the procedural provisions of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the court for the clarification of legal issues.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Salary increase calculation basis for pension agency civil servants under Emergency Ordinance 128/2023: The dispute concerned whether the 5% salary increase mandated by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 128/2023 applies to civil servants in County Pension Agencies based on the base salary in force in December 2023 or the base salary in force on January 1, 2024. The decision was grounded in the procedural provisions of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which governs the admissibility requirements for references to the court for the clarification of legal issues.

Keywords

AI generated
pension increase calculation of salary civil servant Civil Procedure Code emergency government ordinance procedural requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory nature of the decision.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory nature of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 345 Dosar nr. 1071/1/2025

Şedinţa din 6 octombrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Iaşi – Secţia a II-a civilă-contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 1403/99/2024, privind lămurirea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă majorarea de 5% rezultată din aplicarea art. III pct. 3 şi 4 şi ale art. IV din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 128/2023 se aplică în cazul funcţionarilor angajaţi ai Caselor Judeţene de Pensii raportat la salariul de bază la nivel central aflat în plată în luna decembrie 2023 sau la salariul de bază la nivel central aflat în plată la 01.01.2024.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.