Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_229637 AI generated

Eligibility for military rent compensation: exclusion of voluntary transfer from post

Case Number ICCJ_229637
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference question raised by the Cluj County Court regarding the interpretation of Romanian military housing regulations. The dispute concerned whether a military personnel member’s voluntary transfer ("schimbarea din funcţie la cerere") precludes the eligibility for a rent compensation allowance, in contrast to a "transfer on request." The challenge involved the application of Article 201 of Law No. 80/1995, Government Decision No. 1867/2005, and Articles 40-43 of Annex 7 Section II of the Internal Affairs Ministry Order No. 177/2016. The Supreme Court did not resolve the substantive legal question, instead ruling that the submission itself failed to meet admissibility requirements, thereby leaving the lower court's procedural pathway unaltered without establishing a binding interpretation on the distinction between the two types of transfers for compensation purposes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 201 din Legea nr. 80/1995, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Eligibility for military rent compensation: exclusion of voluntary transfer from post: The dispute concerned whether a military personnel member’s voluntary transfer ("schimbarea din funcţie la cerere") precludes the eligibility for a rent compensation allowance, in contrast to a "transfer on request." The challenge involved the application of Article 201 of Law No. 80/1995, Government Decision No. 1867/2005, and Articles 40-43 of Annex 7 Section II of the Internal Affairs Ministry Order No. 177/2016. The Supreme Court did not resolve the substantive legal question, instead ruling that the submission itself failed to meet admissibility requirements, thereby leaving the lower court's procedural pathway unaltered without establishing a binding interpretation on the distinction between the two types of transfers for compensation purposes.

Keywords

AI generated
military personnel housing law exclusion order procedural requirement transfer of tenancy expatriation and foreign residence allowances

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 201 din Legea nr. 80/1995
Dacă, în interpretarea şi aplicarea art. 201 din Legea nr. 80/1995 şi art.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the mandatory nature of the decision regarding the admissibility of the reference question.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 344/2025
Military rent compensation eligibility: non-applicability of voluntary change of position versus service-related transfer under restrictive statutory enumeration
Decizia nr. 5904/2021
Statutory rent compensation for transferred military cadres: irrelevance of lease agreement validity and jurisdiction of administrative courts
ICCJ_234975
Eligibility for military monthly rent compensation allowance for joint residential purchase involving third-party mortgage codeebtor
Decizia nr. 2290/2019
Eligibility for military rent compensation and duty to report residence acquisition within expanded garrison limits
Decizia nr. 311/2025
Military transport allowance eligibility and compatibility with mortgage compensation under HG 1,198/2022

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the mandatory nature of the decision regarding the admissibility of the reference question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 344 Dosar nr. 1044/1/2025

Şedinţa din 6 octombrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Cluj – Secţia mixtă de contencios adminstrativ şi fiscal, de conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 5777/117/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă, în interpretarea şi aplicarea art. 201 din Legea nr. 80/1995 şi art. 2 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1867/2005 coroborate cu art. 40-43 din Anexa 7 Secţiunea a II-a din Ordinul Ministerului Afacerilor Interne nr. 177/2016, schimbarea din funcţie la cerere, spre deosebire de mutarea la cerere, este de natură a împiedica acordarea compensaţiei pentru chirie cadrelor militare în activitate.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 6 octombrie 2025.