Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_229620 AI generated

Correction of material error in judicial decision: classification of pre-judicial service as legal advisor tenure rather than judicial seniority

Case Number ICCJ_229620
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, Full Bench for Resolving Legal Issues, ordered the correction of a material error in the operative part of its prior Decision No. 271 of June 30, 2025, published in the Official Gazette, thereby clarifying that time served prior to appointment in the judiciary represents service in the position of legal advisor rather than judicial seniority. This procedural ruling resolved a drafting inaccuracy in a decision concerning the interpretation of seniority requirements for judges, specifically addressing whether prior professional experience counts toward judicial tenure. The court acted ex officio pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates the rectification of material errors in judgments to ensure the legal text accurately reflects the intended substantive ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Correction of material error in judicial decision: classification of pre-judicial service as legal advisor tenure rather than judicial seniority: 271 of June 30, 2025, published in the Official Gazette, thereby clarifying that time served prior to appointment in the judiciary represents service in the position of legal advisor rather than judicial seniority. This procedural ruling resolved a drafting inaccuracy in a decision concerning the interpretation of seniority requirements for judges, specifically addressing whether prior professional experience counts toward judicial tenure. The court acted ex officio pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which mandates the rectification of material errors in judgments to ensure the legal text accurately reflects the intended substantive ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
correction of material error seniority interpretation of a judgment procedural orders compensation for judicial errors article of civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule cited to establish the mandatory nature of the correction of the material error.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule cited to establish the mandatory nature of the correction of the material error.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta încheierii Dosar nr. 193/1/2025

Ședința din 29 septembrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DISPUNE:

Din oficiu, dispune îndreptarea erorii materiale strecurate în dispozitivul Deciziei nr. 271 din 30 iunie 2025 a Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I nr. 868 din 23 septembrie 2025, în sensul că, în loc de „iar ulterior a fost numită în magistratură, reprezintă vechime în magistratură”, se va trece „reprezintă vechime în funcţia de consilier juridic”.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 29 septembrie 2025.