Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_229571 AI generated

Calculation of monthly allowance under Emergency Ordinance No. 111/2010: validity of gap period before methodological norms entered into force

Case Number ICCJ_229571
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the Full Panel for the Settlement of Legal Issues, dismissed as inadmissible the referral submitted by the Court of Appeal of Târgu Mureș, thereby upholding the prevailing position that no binding interpretation was required at this judicial level. The dispute concerned the calculation methodology for the monthly allowance under Article 5 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 111/2010, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 164/2022, specifically regarding the gap period between the statutory deadline for issuing methodological norms (60 days from December 7, 2022) and the entry into force of Government Decision No. 865/2023 on September 19, 2023. The decision relies on the procedural framework of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, establishing that the court lacks the mandate or basis to issue a preliminary ruling on this specific interpretive gap in social security benefits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Calculation of monthly allowance under Emergency Ordinance No. 111/2010: validity of gap period before methodological norms entered into force: The dispute concerned the calculation methodology for the monthly allowance under Article 5 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 111/2010, as amended by Emergency Government Ordinance No. 164/2022, specifically regarding the gap period between the statutory deadline for issuing methodological norms (60 days from December 7, 2022) and the entry into force of Government Decision No. 865/2023 on September 19, 2023. The decision relies on the procedural framework of Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, establishing that the court lacks the mandate or basis to issue a preliminary ruling on this specific interpretive gap in social security benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
statutory deadline emergency government ordinance social allowance calculation of benefit framework decision legal methodology

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding for the referring court.
AI generated
ICCJ_232865
Proportional allowance question under Law No. 153/2017 referred for preliminary ruling declared inadmissible
ICCJ_222137
Admissibility of preliminary reference on calculation basis for 2% daily allowance under emergency ordinance
ICCJ_220713
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on effective date of public sector salary indemnity calculation under OUG 130/2021 and Law 103/2023
ICCJ_225821
Inadmissible referral on public-sector allowance calculation; no binding ruling issued.
Decizia nr. 115/2025
Recalculation of public-sector child-rearing allowances based on retroactive salary adjustments: admissibility barred by prior binding interpretation of OUG 111/2010

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding for the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 323 Dosar nr. 1025/1/2025

Ședința din 22 septembrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Târgu Mureş - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 4589/102/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la chestiunea de drept referitoare la:

Modul de calcul al indemnizaţiei lunare prevăzute de art. 5 din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 111/2010, astfel cum a fost modificată prin Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 164/2022, în perioada cuprinsă între data prevăzută de art. II din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 164/2022, ca fiind termenul limită pentru emiterea de către Guvern a normelor metodologice de aplicare a prevederilor Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 111/2010 (respectiv în termen de 60 de zile de la data de 7 decembrie 2022, dată la care a intrat în vigoare Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 164/2022) şi data de 19 septembrie 2023 la care a intrat în vigoare Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 865/2023.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 22 septembrie 2025.