Referral on salary increase for town hall officials on land commission ruled inadmissible.
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for the preliminary resolution of questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Dolj Tribunal (Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section) in case no. 3368/63/2024, seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of art. II of Law no. 263/2006 approving and amending Government Emergency Ordinance no. 209/2005 on property-law amendments. The question posed was whether public servants from town halls who were also members of the local commission applying Law no. 247/2005 are entitled to the monthly 50% increase of their base salary under art. II of Law no. 263/2006 where they were appointed to that commission after 03.07.2007. The referral was rejected as inadmissible, and therefore no substantive interpretation was given and no ruling was made on the entitlement; the dismissal is binding under art. 521 para. 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral on salary increase for town hall officials on land commission ruled inadmissible: 3368/63/2024, seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of art. II of Law no. 263/2006 approving and amending Government Emergency Ordinance no. 209/2005 on property-law amendments. The question posed was whether public servants from town halls who were also members of the local commission applying Law no. 247/2005 are entitled to the monthly 50% increase of their base salary under art. II of Law no. 263/2006 where they were appointed to that commission after 03.07.2007. The referral was rejected as inadmissible, and therefore no substantive interpretation was given and no ruling was made on the entitlement; the dismissal is binding under art. 521 para. 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedDeclares the decision binding on courts following the preliminary ruling procedure.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 313 Dosar nr. 321/1/2025
Ședința din 22 septembrie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Dolj - Secția de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 3368/63/2024, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile privind dezlegarea chestiunii de drept ce vizează interpretarea dispozițiilor art. II din Legea nr. 263/2006 privind aprobarea Ordonanţei de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 209/2005 pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative din domeniul proprietăţii, cu completările ulterioare, respectiv:
„Dacă funcționarii publici din cadrul primăriilor, care au avut şi calitatea de membri ai Comisiei locale de aplicare a Legii nr. 247/2005, beneficiază de sporul lunar de 50% din salariul de încadrare prevăzut de art. II din Legea nr. 263/2006, în condițiile în care au fost desemnați în respectiva comisie după data de 03.07.2007".
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 22 septembrie 2025.