Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_229355 AI generated

Salary calculation for judicial police officers seconded to anticorruption bodies: inapplicability of Framework Law No. 153/2017 Annex VI Art. 11

Case Number ICCJ_229355
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the Chamber for Resolving Issues of Law, admitted the connected referrals and issued a binding preliminary ruling, determining that the salary rights of judicial police officers seconded from the Ministry of Internal Affairs to the National Anti-Corruption Directorate or the Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism cannot be calculated by reference to Article 11 of Annex No. VI to Framework Law No. 153/2017. The dispute concerned the proper legal basis for determining salary entitlements during the period of secondment, challenging whether the specific article regarding certain career categories in the public salary framework law applied to these specific positions. The decisive legal basis was the interpretation and application of Article 11 of Annex No. VI to Framework Law No. 153/2017, with the court establishing that this provision is inapplicable for salary determination in the context of secondments to the specified anti-corruption and organized crime investigation bodies.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 11 din anexa nr. VI la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Salary calculation for judicial police officers seconded to anticorruption bodies: inapplicability of Framework Law No. 153/2017 Annex VI Art. 11: VI to Framework Law No. 153/2017. The dispute concerned the proper legal basis for determining salary entitlements during the period of secondment, challenging whether the specific article regarding certain career categories in the public salary framework law applied to these specific positions. The decisive legal basis was the interpretation and application of Article 11 of Annex No. VI to Framework Law No. 153/2017, with the court establishing that this provision is inapplicable for salary determination in the context of secondments to the specified anti-corruption and organized crime investigation bodies.

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of salary police officers judicial law judicial investigation organized crime basis of calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 11 din anexa nr. VI la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017
Substantive provision interpreted by the court to determine that salary rights during secondment cannot be calculated by reference to this article.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule cited to establish the binding nature of the preliminary ruling.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4080/2022
Salary calculation for judicial police officers in leadership roles at the National Anti-Corruption Directorate: inapplicability of prosecutor tenure-based allowances
Decizia nr. 254/2022
Judicial police officer salary calculation: exclusion of function tenure from base salary hierarchy under Framework Law 153/2017.
Decizia nr. 6138/2021
Salary classification of leadership positions in anticorruption directorates: inapplicability of judicial function seniority criteria to police officers
Decizia nr. 4498/2021
Judicial Police Salary Hierarchization under Law No. 153/2017: Appeal Dismissed, Administrative Orders Upheld
Decizia nr. 306/2022
Whether judicial police officers' tenure at the National Anticorruption Directorate triggers higher salary bands reserved for judges and prosecutors under Law No. 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 11 din anexa nr. VI la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017

Substantive provision interpreted by the court to determine that salary rights during secondment cannot be calculated by reference to this article.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule cited to establish the binding nature of the preliminary ruling.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 295 Dosar nr. 2705/1/2024

Ședința din 15 septembrie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Constanţa – Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 6955/118/2023 şi de Tribunalul Prahova – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 4364/105/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile.

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 11 din anexa nr. VI la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, stabileşte că:

Pe perioada detaşării, drepturile salariale cuvenite ofiţerilor de poliţie judiciară detaşaţi din cadrul Ministerului Afacerilor Interne la Direcţia Naţională Anticorupţie şi/sau Direcţia de Investigare a Infracţiunilor de Criminalitate Organizată şi Terorism nu pot fi stabilite prin raportare la articolul analizat.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 15 septembrie 2025.