Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228153 AI generated

Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling request on dual salary increase eligibility for pharmacy section heads under Law 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_228153
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a referral submitted by a Court of Appeal for a preliminary ruling on a question of law. The dispute concerned the interpretation of salary regulations for public sector employees, specifically whether a head of a pharmacy section with management duties is entitled to both a 7.5% and a 5% increase to their basic salary. The decisive legal basis involved the framework law on public sector salaries (Law no. 153/2017, specifically Annex II, Chapter I, points 1.4 and 7/11) and Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility of such referrals.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling request on dual salary increase eligibility for pharmacy section heads under Law 153/2017: The dispute concerned the interpretation of salary regulations for public sector employees, specifically whether a head of a pharmacy section with management duties is entitled to both a 7.5% and a 5% increase to their basic salary. The decisive legal basis involved the framework law on public sector salaries (Law no. 153/2017, specifically Annex II, Chapter I, points 1.4 and 7/11) and Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility of such referrals.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure article of civil procedure interpretation of a judgment preliminary question basic salary public employment law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural rule cited to establish the obligatory nature of the preliminary ruling decided by the court.
AI generated
ICCJ_230685
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; prior salary-law decision stands
ICCJ_228140
Inadmissibility of referral on public sector salary calculation and prescription starting point
ICCJ_220639
Preliminary ruling referrals on public sector wage surcharges dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_222143
Referral on public sector salary calculation for newly appointed officials inadmissible
ICCJ_220674
Inadmissibility of preliminary referrals on compensatory salary gaps under Law 153/2017 for the Justice occupational family

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural rule cited to establish the obligatory nature of the preliminary ruling decided by the court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 294 Dosar nr. 196/1/2025

Ședința din 30 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 3022/85/2022, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

În interpretarea prevederilor punctului 1.4, nr. crt. 7 şi 11 din capitolul I al anexei nr. II la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, farmacistul şef de secţie cu atribuţii de gestiune beneficiază atât de majorarea salariului de bază avut cu 7,5%, cât şi de majorarea acestuia cu 5%?

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 30 iunie 2025.