Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228135 AI generated

Referral on suspension of public official's service during judicial assistantship declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_228135
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Pitești Court of Appeal, leaving the lower court to resolve the case without a preliminary ruling. The dispute concerned whether a public official's service relationship, governed by the Administrative Code, could be automatically suspended while serving as a judicial assistant, specifically questioning the applicability of Labor Code provisions on suspension by reference to the Administrative Code and the Judicial Organization Law. The legal issue centered on the interplay between Article 50(d) and Article 1 of the Labor Code, Articles 367 and 513(1)(m) of the Administrative Code, and specific provisions of the Judicial Organization Law and the Statute of Judges and Prosecutors regarding the status of judicial assistants.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 122 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 304/2022, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral on suspension of public official's service during judicial assistantship declared inadmissible: The dispute concerned whether a public official's service relationship, governed by the Administrative Code, could be automatically suspended while serving as a judicial assistant, specifically questioning the applicability of Labor Code provisions on suspension by reference to the Administrative Code and the Judicial Organization Law. The legal issue centered on the interplay between Article 50(d) and Article 1 of the Labor Code, Articles 367 and 513(1)(m) of the Administrative Code, and specific provisions of the Judicial Organization Law and the Statute of Judges and Prosecutors regarding the status of judicial assistants.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative dismissal judicial law public officials status of official duty of the prosecutor legal status

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 122 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 304/2022
(1) şi (2) din Codul muncii, având în vedere şi dispoziţiile art. 122 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară, cu modificările ulterioare şi art.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the procedural basis for the binding nature of the decision in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 277/2025
Suspendability of public service relationship during judicial assistantship and applicability of Labor Code Art. 50(d) to Administrative Code personnel under Emergency Ordinance No. 62/2024 scope
ICCJ_230276
Referral for preliminary ruling on salary rights of suspended public servants inadmissible.
Decizia nr. 38/2020
Civil servant's suspension claims referral inadmissible; seniority and leave questions lack interpretive difficulty.
Decizia nr. 143/2024
Incompatibility of simultaneous public office and judicial assistant role despite service suspension
Decizia nr. 379/2025
Public official suspension rights: scope of salary entitlements under Law 188/1999 regarding seniority, vouchers, and leave

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the procedural basis for the binding nature of the decision in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 277 Dosar nr. 3042/1/2024

Ședința din 30 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti -Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 862/90/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă în materia raporturilor de serviciu, guvernate de prevederile Codului administrativ, se poate dispune suspendarea de drept a raportului de serviciu al funcţionarului public pe perioada în care acesta exercită un mandat de asistent judiciar, respectiv dacă pot fi aplicate în speţă dispoziţiile art. 50 lit. d) din Codul muncii, prin raportare la prevederile art. 513 alin. (1) lit. m) coroborat cu art. 367 din Codul administrativ şi art. 1 alin. (1) şi (2) din Codul muncii, având în vedere şi dispoziţiile art. 122 alin. (2) din Legea nr. 304/2022 privind organizarea judiciară, cu modificările ulterioare şi art. 227 alin. (1) şi (3) din Legea nr. 303/2022 privind statutul judecătorilor şi procurorilor, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 30 iunie 2025.