Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228132 AI generated

Prison police salary referral dismissed as inadmissible; lower court to resolve wage calculation dispute.

Case Number ICCJ_228132
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Constanța Court of Appeal, which sought a preliminary ruling on whether Article 4 of Annex VI to Framework Law No. 153/2017 requires the base salary and allowances of prison police officers to be calculated according to the annually guaranteed national minimum wage or by reference to the 2009 salary level. No substantive ruling was issued, so the lower court must resolve the underlying administrative dispute itself. The decisive basis was procedural admissibility under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, with the court finding the referral did not meet the statutory conditions for a preliminary ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) C. proc. civ; Prison police salary referral dismissed as inadmissible; lower court to resolve wage calculation dispute: 153/2017 requires the base salary and allowances of prison police officers to be calculated according to the annually guaranteed national minimum wage or by reference to the 2009 salary level. No substantive ruling was issued, so the lower court must resolve the underlying administrative dispute itself. The decisive basis was procedural admissibility under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, with the court finding the referral did not meet the statutory conditions for a preliminary ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
calculation of salary police officers reference for a preliminary ruling minimum wage statutory basis procedural issues

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) C. proc. civ
Declares that the decision is binding pursuant to the mandatory effect of the preliminary ruling procedure.
AI generated
ICCJ_229607
Referral on penitentiary salary supplement calculation and 2017 wage framework law application declared inadmissible
Decizia nr. 274/2025
Prison Police Salary Base: Minimum Wage Reference Versus 2009 Function Salary Level
ICCJ_230700
Rent compensation for judicial police officers: referral for salary-computation ruling inadmissible
ICCJ_148184
Police officer salary allowance referral declared inadmissible
ICCJ_225063
Preliminary ruling request on police salary increase inadmissible for lack of procedural conditions

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) C. proc. civ.

Declares that the decision is binding pursuant to the mandatory effect of the preliminary ruling procedure.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.274 Dosar nr. 204/1/2025

Ședința din 30 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa - Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 2941/118/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă prevederile art. 4 din anexa nr. VI la Legea - cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, se interpretează în sensul că baza de calcul a salariului şi a sporurilor cuvenite poliţiştilor de penitenciare se calculează în funcţie de salariul minim brut pe ţară garantat anual sau prin raportare la salariul funcţiei la nivelul anului 2009.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 30 iunie 2025.