Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228126 AI generated

Labor dispute referral inadmissible; merits of interest claim unresolved

Case Number ICCJ_228126
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling, leaving the underlying labor dispute unresolved at this stage. The question concerned whether the Ministry of Justice could be ordered to pay legal-interest damages on sums owed under two ministerial orders when funds were lacking and payment had been only partial. The court based its decision on procedural admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings, without reaching the merits of the interest claim.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Labor dispute referral inadmissible; merits of interest claim unresolved: The question concerned whether the Ministry of Justice could be ordered to pay legal-interest damages on sums owed under two ministerial orders when funds were lacking and payment had been only partial. The court based its decision on procedural admissibility requirements for preliminary rulings, without reaching the merits of the interest claim.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling referral order damages payment payment of interest labor disputes partial claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Declares the decision binding in accordance with the legal provision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 48/2018
Labor dispute preliminary ruling referral dismissed as inadmissible; appellate merits adjudication to proceed.
ICCJ_154525
Salary dispute referral ruled inadmissible; Ministry of Justice standing question unresolved.
ICCJ_230723
Salary rights reference value referral inadmissible; magistrates' discrimination claims left unresolved
Decizia nr. 6/2026
Preliminary referral on wage effects of prior ruling inadmissible as merits-bound application question
ICCJ_127715
Salary referral deemed inadmissible as abstract; pay dispute returns to lower court

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Declares the decision binding in accordance with the legal provision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 268 Dosar nr. 3048/1/2024

Şedinţa din 30 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 16172/3/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile privind următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă, în lipsa fondurilor pentru plata sumelor rezultate din aplicarea Ordinelor ministrului justiţiei nr. 1184/C din 12 iulie 2023 şi nr. 2069/C din 25 octombrie 2023, Ministerul Justiţiei poate fi obligat la plata daunelor-interese sub forma dobânzii legale aferente sumelor datorate şi care au fost achitate doar parţial de către Ministerul Justiţiei.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 30 iunie 2025.