Inadmissibility of reference question on the ten-year statute of limitations for enforcing alimony established by property division judgment
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference question submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal regarding the application of the ten-year statute of limitations to the enforcement of alimony payments established through a property division ruling. The dispute centered on a civil procedure issue specifically whether the ten-year limitation period under Article 706(1), second sentence of the Civil Procedure Code, applies to the right to enforce compulsory execution of sums owed as alimony in the context of a partition decision. The court resolved the matter by rejecting the jurisdictional reference, thereby leaving the procedural question unresolved by the High Court and maintaining the status quo of the underlying civil litigation without establishing a binding interpretation on the limitation period for such enforcement actions.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of reference question on the ten-year statute of limitations for enforcing alimony established by property division judgment: The dispute centered on a civil procedure issue specifically whether the ten-year limitation period under Article 706(1), second sentence of the Civil Procedure Code, applies to the right to enforce compulsory execution of sums owed as alimony in the context of a partition decision. The court resolved the matter by rejecting the jurisdictional reference, thereby leaving the procedural question unresolved by the High Court and maintaining the status quo of the underlying civil litigation without establishing a binding interpretation on the limitation period for such enforcement actions.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish that the decision resolving the admissibility of the reference question is obligatory for all courts.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 262 Dosar nr. 353/1/2025
Ședința din 23 iunie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul București -Secția a IV - a civilă, în dosarul nr. 5475/302/2023, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:
În interpretarea prevederilor art. 706 alin. (1) teza a II-a din Codul de procedură civilă, termenul de prescripție de 10 ani se aplică și în ceea ce privește prescripția dreptului de a obține executarea silită a sumelor datorate cu titlu de sultă, stabilite printr-o hotărâre de partaj?
Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 23 iunie 2025.