Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228072 AI generated

Scope of annulment versus rectification in civil enforcement: partial annuement of enforcement acts versus mandatory rectification of claim amount

Case Number ICCJ_228072
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, leaving the lower court’s procedural posture regarding the civil enforcement case unchanged. The dispute concerned the interpretation of judicial powers in annulment proceedings for enforcement acts, specifically whether a court modifying the claim amount can partially annul enforcement acts or is limited to issuing a rectification order. The decision was based on procedural inadmissibility grounds under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby denying the sought clarification on the application of Article 720(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of annulment versus rectification in civil enforcement: partial annuement of enforcement acts versus mandatory rectification of claim amount: The dispute concerned the interpretation of judicial powers in annulment proceedings for enforcement acts, specifically whether a court modifying the claim amount can partially annul enforcement acts or is limited to issuing a rectification order. The decision was based on procedural inadmissibility grounds under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby denying the sought clarification on the application of Article 720(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
civil annulment enforcement of ruling application for enforcement - Decision article of civil procedure preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the mandatory legal basis for the procedural form and binding nature of the court's decision in the final operative order.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1115/2023
Inadmissibility of appeal against final annulment decision in civil enforcement compensation dispute
Decizia nr. 516/2010
Contestație în anulare inadmisibilă: reiterearea motivelor de recurs și caracterul de cale de retractare al remediului
Decizia nr. 1429/2014
Scope of partial annulment of state public property inventory and specificity of disputed land surfaces
Decizia nr. 1530/2020
Recourse inadmissible against final annulment complaint under civil procedure's exhaustive appeal limits
Decizia nr. 2186/2014
Negative jurisdictional conflict resolved: annulment claim over enforcement acts remitted to first-instance court.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the mandatory legal basis for the procedural form and binding nature of the court's decision in the final operative order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 249 Dosar nr. 2901/1/2024

Ședința din 23 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti – Secţia a V-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 13735/301/2020*, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea prevederilor art. 720 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură civilă, dacă soluţia instanţei de anulare a unui act de executare poate avea un efect de anulare parţială a actelor de executare cu privire la suma urmărită sau dacă prin modificarea cuantumului creanţei instanţa este ţinută de pronunţarea unei soluţii de îndreptare a actului de executare silită.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 23 iunie 2025.