Admissibility of preliminary ruling on inclusion of judicially awarded mobility and confidentiality allowances in military pension calculation base
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, leaving the lower court to resolve the matter. The dispute concerned whether mobility and confidentiality allowances granted via a judicial order for salary equalization to a public official serving as a legal advisor in a penitentiary hospital are included in or excluded from the calculation base for state military pensions. The decisive legal issue involved the interpretation of Article 28(1) and Article 28(1)(p) of Law No. 223/2015 regarding state military pensions, specifically determining if such judicially awarded allowances fall within the scope of the pension calculation base or are subject to the specific exclusions provided in the statute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 28 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 223/2015, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary ruling on inclusion of judicially awarded mobility and confidentiality allowances in military pension calculation base: The dispute concerned whether mobility and confidentiality allowances granted via a judicial order for salary equalization to a public official serving as a legal advisor in a penitentiary hospital are included in or excluded from the calculation base for state military pensions. The decisive legal issue involved the interpretation of Article 28(1) and Article 28(1)(p) of Law No. 223/2015 regarding state military pensions, specifically determining if such judicially awarded allowances fall within the scope of the pension calculation base or are subject to the specific exclusions provided in the statute.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision regarding the dismissal of the preliminary ruling request.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 237 Dosar nr. 2791/1/2024
Ședința din 16 iunie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale, în dosarul nr. 2061/93/2022, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:
Dacă sporurile de mobilitate şi de confidenţialitate, acordate prin hotărâre judecătorească de egalizare a drepturilor salariale, unui funcţionar public încadrat ca ofiţer principal I - consilier juridic în cadrul unui spital penitenciar - sunt incluse în baza de calcul al pensiei militare de stat potrivit art. 28 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 223/2015 privind pensiile militare de stat, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, sau sunt excluse din aceasta, potrivit art. 28 alin. (1) lit. p) din acelaşi act normativ.
Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 16 iunie 2025.