Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228037 AI generated

Police transport rights question left unresolved as preliminary referral ruled inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_228037
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling, thereby leaving the lower court's question unresolved and the prior proceedings intact. The dispute concerned whether police officers who had established their domicile in the locality to which they were transferred for service still qualify for transport rights under art. 9(1)(j) of Government Decision No. 1198/2022 (in force at the time of the 03.01.2023 request) if they subsequently established their residence in another locality more than 301 km from both the workplace and their domicile. The Court based its decision on procedural inadmissibility, as the referral was lodged outside the permissible scope for a preliminary ruling under art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Police transport rights question left unresolved as preliminary referral ruled inadmissible: The dispute concerned whether police officers who had established their domicile in the locality to which they were transferred for service still qualify for transport rights under art. 9(1)(j) of Government Decision No. 1198/2022 (in force at the time of the 03.01.2023 request) if they subsequently established their residence in another locality more than 301 km from both the workplace and their domicile. The Court based its decision on procedural inadmissibility, as the referral was lodged outside the permissible scope for a preliminary ruling under art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
right of residence police officers preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision procedural rights established right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Declares the decision binding as required under the provision on preliminary ruling decisions.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 231/2025
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on interpretation of border police commuting transport reimbursement rights under Government Decision No. 1,198/2022
ICCJ_229559
Referral on rent compensation vs. transport allowance overlap ruled inadmissible
Decizia nr. 278/2025
Police housing allowance referral for preliminary ruling inadmissible for misstating legal issue
ICCJ_137596
Inadmissible referral on preliminary question of law leaves legal issue unresolved
Decizia nr. 1996/2024
Challenge to police transport regulation provisions: appeal allowed and judgment quashed and remanded due to lack of jurisdictional limits

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Declares the decision binding as required under the provision on preliminary ruling decisions.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 234 Dosar nr. 294/1/2025

Ședința din 16 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia – Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 490/85/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Poliţiştii care şi-au stabilit domiciliul în localitatea în care au fost mutaţi în interes de serviciu, beneficiază de drepturile prevăzute la art. 9 alin. (1) lit. j) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1198/2022 privind drepturile de transport, pe teritoriul naţional, ale personalului din instituţiile de apărare, ordine publică şi securitate naţională, forma în vigoare la data cererii (03.01.2023) în situaţia în care, ulterior mutării, şi-au stabilit reşedinţa într-o altă localitate, situată la o distanţă mai mare de 301 km faţă de localitatea în care se află locul de muncă şi domiciliul?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 16 iunie 2025.