Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_228034 AI generated

Reference on border control personnel benefits declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_228034
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Timișoara Court of Appeal, leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without the requested binding interpretation. The dispute concerned whether personnel working at border control points who have never held domicile or residence in the municipality of their current or previous duty station are entitled to specific benefits under the administrative and fiscal litigation framework, particularly when they have been transferred by request to different control points after their initial appointment. The core legal issue involved the interpretation and application of Article 9(1)(h) in conjunction with Articles 9(3) and (4) of Government Decision No. 1198/2022, which govern the entitlement of such staff to relocation-related rights or benefits based on their lack of local domicile or residence history.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Reference on border control personnel benefits declared inadmissible: The dispute concerned whether personnel working at border control points who have never held domicile or residence in the municipality of their current or previous duty station are entitled to specific benefits under the administrative and fiscal litigation framework, particularly when they have been transferred by request to different control points after their initial appointment. The core legal issue involved the interpretation and application of Article 9(1)(h) in conjunction with Articles 9(3) and (4) of Government Decision No. 1198/2022, which govern the entitlement of such staff to relocation-related rights or benefits based on their lack of local domicile or residence history.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling entitlement to benefits border control right of residence administrative dismissal staff relocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory.
AI generated
ICCJ_228041
Inadmissibility of reference to determine entitlement of contractual security guards to hazardous conditions allowance under conflicting occupational family regulations
ICCJ_140167
Reference on police and military dismissal benefits dismissed as inadmissible
Decizia nr. 1458/2017
Inadmissibility of appeal against final border refusal decision for EU citizens
Decizia nr. 557/2004
Inadmissibility of cassation against final decision on foreigner's departure order
ICCJ_225060
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling on re-entry into force of auxiliary staff statute and validity of suspended retirement allowance

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 231 Dosar nr. 2796/1/2024

Ședința din 16 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Timişoara – Secţia de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 2042/108/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile privind lămurirea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Personalul care îşi desfăşoară activitatea în punctele de control pentru trecerea frontierei, care nu a avut niciodată domiciliul sau reşedinţa în aceeaşi localitate în care îşi desfăşoară sau şi-a desfăşurat activitatea, beneficiază de drepturile prevăzute la art. 9 alin. (1) lit. h), coroborate cu dispoziţiile art. 9 alin. (3) şi (4) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 1198/2022, şi în situaţia în care pe parcursul carierei au intervenit mutări la cerere în alte puncte de control decât cel în care a fost numit în prima funcţie?”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 16 iunie 2025.