Pension contribution cross-recognition question deemed inadmissible for preliminary ruling
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for the preliminary resolution of legal questions, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Oradea Court of Appeal (Civil Section I) in case no. 2620/111/2023, which sought a preliminary ruling on whether Article 192(1) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system requires mutual recognition of contribution periods between the public pension system and non-integrated special social insurance systems for the purpose of establishing entitlement to partial early retirement pension. The referral was rejected as inadmissible, so the procedural decision—rather than a substantive interpretation of the pension law—prevails, and the ruling is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The underlying dispute involves the interpretation of pension legislation concerning the cross-system recognition of contribution periods for early retirement eligibility.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 192 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010, Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Pension contribution cross-recognition question deemed inadmissible for preliminary ruling: 2620/111/2023, which sought a preliminary ruling on whether Article 192(1) of Law No. 263/2010 on the unified public pension system requires mutual recognition of contribution periods between the public pension system and non-integrated special social insurance systems for the purpose of establishing entitlement to partial early retirement pension. The referral was rejected as inadmissible, so the procedural decision—rather than a substantive interpretation of the pension law—prevails, and the ruling is binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The underlying dispute involves the interpretation of pension legislation concerning the cross-system recognition of contribution periods for early retirement eligibility.
Keywords
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedDeclares the decision binding for all courts, as required by the Code of Civil Procedure in the final order.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 221 Dosar nr. 2877/1/2024
Ședința din 16 iunie 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Oradea – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 2620/111/2023, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:
Dacă dispozițiile art. 192 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice se interpretează în sensul în care între sistemul public de pensii și sistemele proprii de asigurări sociale neintegrate se recunosc reciproc stagiile de cotizare în vederea deschiderii dreptului la pensie anticipată parțială.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 16 iunie 2025.