Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_228010 AI generated

Delegated anticorruption investigators' competence limited to enumerated corruption offenses

Case Number ICCJ_228010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the appeal in the interest of the law filed by the managing board of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal and established, as binding pursuant to Article 474(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, that judicial police officers of the National Anticorruption Directorate are competent to perform, by delegation and under the conditions provided by law, criminal investigation acts ordered by the competent prosecutor exclusively in cases concerning offenses listed in Article 1(2) of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 120/2005. The dispute concerned the scope of delegated investigative competence of these officers, and the Court resolved the divergent practice by ruling that such delegation is limited to corruption-related offenses expressly enumerated in that provision, not extended to other offenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1 alin. (2) din OUG nr. 120/2005, art. 474 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură penală; Delegated anticorruption investigators' competence limited to enumerated corruption offenses: 120/2005. The dispute concerned the scope of delegated investigative competence of these officers, and the Court resolved the divergent practice by ruling that such delegation is limited to corruption-related offenses expressly enumerated in that provision, not extended to other offenses.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal investigation police officers judicial law limits of competence abuse of official authority e-justice
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 1 alin. (2) din OUG nr. 120/2005

Identified the offences over which police judicial officers of the Anti-Corruption General Directorate have delegated procedural competence.

art. 474 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură penală

Mandated the binding nature of the decision in the interest of the law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru soluționarea recursului în interesul legii

Minuta deciziei nr. 8 Dosar nr. 531/1/2025

Ședința din 16 iunie 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Admite recursul în interesul legii formulat de Colegiul de conducere al Curţii de Apel Alba Iulia şi stabileşte că:

Lucrătorii poliţiei judiciare din cadrul Direcţiei Generale Anticorupţie au competenţa să efectueze, prin delegare, în condiţiile prevăzute de lege, actele de cercetare penală dispuse de procurorul competent exclusiv în cauzele privind infracţiunile prevăzute de art. 1 alin. (2) din OUG nr. 120/2005.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 474 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, azi, 16 iunie 2025.