Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_226628 AI generated

Employee commute reimbursement question unresolved as referral inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_226628
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the referral from the Cluj Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether the cost of employee transport between home and work could be reimbursed under Government Decisions no. 39/2024 for public servants and contractual staff in the "Administration" occupational family of commune-level local governments, absent a local council decision adopted under art. 111(1) of Framework Law no. 153/2017 on public-sector pay. The referral was dismissed without deciding the substantive question, as the request did not meet the admissibility conditions for a preliminary ruling under Romanian procedural law; no further order was made, and the decision is binding under art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Employee commute reimbursement question unresolved as referral inadmissible: 39/2024 for public servants and contractual staff in the "Administration" occupational family of commune-level local governments, absent a local council decision adopted under art. 111(1) of Framework Law no. 153/2017 on public-sector pay. The referral was dismissed without deciding the substantive question, as the request did not meet the admissibility conditions for a preliminary ruling under Romanian procedural law; no further order was made, and the decision is binding under art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
reimbursement of transport costs referral order transport law preliminary decision home working e-government

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to declare the referral binding.
AI generated
ICCJ_232205
Commuting-teacher reimbursement referral dismissed as inadmissible; no legal interpretation issued.
Decizia nr. 195/2025
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on transport expense reimbursement for local public employees absent local council decision
Decizia nr. 236/2025
Referral inadmissible where employer is state-controlled joint-stock company paid via collective labor agreement, excluding application of public funds salary framework law
ICCJ_229559
Referral on rent compensation vs. transport allowance overlap ruled inadmissible
Decizia nr. 65/2024
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling referral under OUG 62/2024 where railway transport company personnel are not paid from public funds

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to declare the referral binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 195 Dosar nr. 2713/1/2024

Ședința din 26 mai 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Cluj – Secţia a III-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal în Dosarul nr. 361/84/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă se poate deconta contravaloarea cheltuielilor de transport între localitatea de domiciliu/reşedinţă şi localitatea unde se află locul de muncă al salariaţilor în baza Hotărârilor Guvernului nr. 39/2024 privind aprobarea modalităţii de decontare a cheltuielilor de transport pentru funcţionarii publici şi personalul contractual din cadrul familiei ocupaţionale «Administraţie» din aparatul de specialitate al primarilor comunelor şi instituţiilor şi serviciilor publice de interes local, înfiinţate în subordinea, coordonarea sau sub autoritatea consiliilor locale din comune, în lipsa adoptării unei hotărâri de către consiliul local conform art. 111 alin. (1) din Legea-cadrul nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 26 mai 2025.