Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_226627 AI generated

Admissibility of referral on retroactive application of public sector salary indexation to military and police base pay

Case Number ICCJ_226627
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the referral submitted by the Bâcau Court of Appeal, effectively upholding the lower court's discretion and leaving the pending civil dispute regarding salary indexation unresolved by this abstract ruling. The case involved a dispute over whether the update of a military or police officer's base pay, governed by the Framework Law on Public Sector Salaries and specific government emergency ordinances, had to be applied retroactively from January 1, 2023, in the specific amounts stipulated by a subsequent Government Decision intended for the security sector personnel. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility of referrals to resolve questions of law, rendering the mandatory decision final without providing the substantive legal clarification requested regarding the application of legislative modifications to public sector wages.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of referral on retroactive application of public sector salary indexation to military and police base pay: The case involved a dispute over whether the update of a military or police officer's base pay, governed by the Framework Law on Public Sector Salaries and specific government emergency ordinances, had to be applied retroactively from January 1, 2023, in the specific amounts stipulated by a subsequent Government Decision intended for the security sector personnel. The decisive procedural basis for the dismissal was Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the admissibility of referrals to resolve questions of law, rendering the mandatory decision final without providing the substantive legal clarification requested regarding the application of legislative modifications to public sector wages.

Keywords

AI generated
military personnel police officers Civil Procedure Code framework decision e-government public employment law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision rejecting the referral.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 177/2025
Inadmissibility of preliminary referrals for military salary recalculation due to failure to identify a distinct legal question
Decizia nr. 56/2018
Referral for preliminary ruling on retroactive application of salary equalization measures to public sector staff entitled to prior judicial increases declared inadmissible for lack of legal novelty.
ICCJ_225021
Admissibility of referral on interpretation of public sector salary calculation; referrals rejected as inadmissible
Decizia nr. 82/2025
Military pension indexation and salary calculation: admissibility of referrals to resolve whether military ranks and pensions must be adjusted by reference to the national minimum wage or specific sectoral reference values.
ICCJ_224978
Inadmissibility of referral regarding application of central civil service salary grids and fiscal capping of security clearance bonuses to subordinate territorial units under Law 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the mandatory nature of the decision rejecting the referral.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 194 Dosar nr. 2712/1/2024

Ședința din 26 mai 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bacău – Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 2461/103/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă actualizarea soldei de grad în baza dispoziţiilor art. 7 alin. (1) şi (3) din Capitolul I din anexa nr. VI la Legea-cadru nr. 153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, potrivit prevederilor art. I alin. (5) şi (6) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 168/2022 privind unele măsuri fiscal-bugetare, prorogarea unor termene, precum şi pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative, se dispune începând cu data de 1 ianuarie 2023 în cuantumul prevăzut de dispoziţiile Hotărârii Guvernului nr. 28/2023 pentru actualizarea cuantumului soldei de grad/salariului gradului profesional deţinut de personalul militar, respectiv de poliţiştii şi poliţiştii de penitenciare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 26 mai 2025.