Mandatory prior investigation and hearing required for written reprimand of public official.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the Panel for Resolving Questions of Law, admitted a referral from the Târgu Mureș Court of Appeal and established that, under Article 493(3) in relation to Article 493(1) of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 57/2019 (the Administrative Code), prior investigation and the hearing of the public official are mandatory prerequisites for the direct application of the disciplinary sanction of "written reprimand." This decision resolves a procedural dispute concerning the validity of administrative disciplinary measures imposed on public servants, clarifying that failure to conduct these preliminary steps renders such sanctions legally deficient. The ruling is based on the interpretation of specific provisions of the Romanian Administrative Code regarding disciplinary procedures and is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Mandatory prior investigation and hearing required for written reprimand of public official: 57/2019 (the Administrative Code), prior investigation and the hearing of the public official are mandatory prerequisites for the direct application of the disciplinary sanction of "written reprimand." This decision resolves a procedural dispute concerning the validity of administrative disciplinary measures imposed on public servants, clarifying that failure to conduct these preliminary steps renders such sanctions legally deficient. The ruling is based on the interpretation of specific provisions of the Romanian Administrative Code regarding disciplinary procedures and is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedMain ground for the verdict, interpreted to establish that prior investigation and hearing are mandatory for applying the written reprimand sanction.
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the decision.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 191 Dosar nr. 126/1/2025
Ședința din 19 mai 2025
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Târgu Mureș - Secția a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 5984/102/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile.
În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 493 alin. (3) raportat la art. 493 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa de urgență a Guvernului nr. 57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, stabileşte că:
Pentru aplicarea în mod direct a sancțiunii disciplinare a „mustrării scrise” este obligatorie cercetarea prealabilă şi audierea funcţionarului public.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 19 mai 2025.