Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_226596 AI generated

Grand Chamber referral on special working conditions for forensic medicine laboratory staff declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_226596
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania dismissed as inadmissible the referral to the Grand Chamber for the resolution of legal issues, meaning the requesting appellate court’s submission was rejected and the dispute remains pending at the instance court. The case involved a procedural challenge regarding whether employees of the Toxicology and Serology Laboratory within a Forensic Medicine Service were legally entitled to special working conditions under specific interpretations of labor and medical legislation. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the inadmissibility of the referral under the civil procedure code, concerning the interpretation of Law No. 104/2003 on the handling of human corpses and organ donation, Government Ordinance No. 1/2000 on forensic medicine institutions, and the precedent set by the Supreme Court’s Grand Chamber Decision No. 24 of October 14, 2019.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 5 din Legea nr. 104/2003, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Grand Chamber referral on special working conditions for forensic medicine laboratory staff declared inadmissible: The case involved a procedural challenge regarding whether employees of the Toxicology and Serology Laboratory within a Forensic Medicine Service were legally entitled to special working conditions under specific interpretations of labor and medical legislation. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the inadmissibility of the referral under the civil procedure code, concerning the interpretation of Law No. 104/2003 on the handling of human corpses and organ donation, Government Ordinance No. 1/2000 on forensic medicine institutions, and the precedent set by the Supreme Court’s Grand Chamber Decision No. 24 of October 14, 2019.

Keywords

AI generated
referral of a procedural submission working conditions Civil Procedure Code interpretation of the law occupational medicine action by staff

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 5 din Legea nr. 104/2003
Dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea art. 5 din Legea nr. 104/2003 privind manipularea cadavrelor umane şi prelevarea organelor şi ţesuturilor de la cadavre în vederea transplantului, republicată, cu modificările ulterioare, respectiv art.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the procedural basis for the obligation to publish the decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 186/2025
Referral inadmissible for lack of genuine legal uncertainty on classification of toxicology laboratory roles as special conditions work
Decizia nr. 17/2025
Admissibility of preliminary referral on entitlement of school medical staff to wage supplements; referrals dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of legal difficulty
Decizia nr. 238/2025
Inadmissibility of referral for preliminary ruling on hazardous work allowance for public sector contractual staff under Law 153/2017
Decizia nr. 4771/2020
Ex lege classification of pathology staff work positions in special working conditions and inapplicability of administrative renewal procedure
Decizia nr. 71/2026
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling referral regarding the distinction between central and local public administration in the salary classification of hospital technical staff under Annex VII to Law No. 153/2017

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the procedural basis for the obligation to publish the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 186 Dosar nr. 229/1/2025

Ședința din 19 mai 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa - Secţia I civilă în dosarul nr. 7066/118/2023, în vederea pronunțării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarele chestiuni de drept:

Dacă în interpretarea şi aplicarea art. 5 din Legea nr. 104/2003 privind manipularea cadavrelor umane şi prelevarea organelor şi ţesuturilor de la cadavre în vederea transplantului, republicată, cu modificările ulterioare, respectiv art. 1 din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 1/2000 privind organizarea activităţii şi funcţionarea instituţiilor de medicină legală, republicată, cu modificările ulterioare, personalul din Laboratorul Toxicologie şi Serologie din cadrul Serviciului de Medicină Legală se încadrează de drept în condiţii deosebite, conform interpretării date de Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept prin decizia nr. 24 din 14 octombrie 2019, publicată în Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr. 1001 din 12 decembrie 2019?

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 19 mai 2025.