Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_226579 AI generated

Admissibility of reference on entitlement of public employees to unconditional home-consignment allowance under Framework Law 153/2017

Case Number ICCJ_226579
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bucharest Court of Appeal, meaning no uniform legal interpretation was issued and the lower court's proceedings remain unaffected by this high court order. The dispute concerned whether employees of the National Administration "Romanian Waters" were entitled to a 15% consignment allowance after January 1, 2023, specifically questioning if the right persisted regardless of whether the specific event requiring home consignment actually occurred. The legal issue centered on the interpretation of Article 10(d) of Annex No. VII to Framework Law No. 153/2017 regarding public sector salaries, where the admissibility check of the reference was the decisive factor leading to the dismissal without resolving the substantive salary rights question.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of reference on entitlement of public employees to unconditional home-consignment allowance under Framework Law 153/2017: The dispute concerned whether employees of the National Administration "Romanian Waters" were entitled to a 15% consignment allowance after January 1, 2023, specifically questioning if the right persisted regardless of whether the specific event requiring home consignment actually occurred. The legal issue centered on the interpretation of Article 10(d) of Annex No. VII to Framework Law No. 153/2017 regarding public sector salaries, where the admissibility check of the reference was the decisive factor leading to the dismissal without resolving the substantive salary rights question.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling right to remain administration of justice public employment law substantive requirements public sector

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish that the decision on the admissibility of the reference is binding.
AI generated
ICCJ_178561
Admissibility of judicial reference on public sector wage calculation under Law No. 153/2017
ICCJ_220712
Admissibility of preliminary reference on equal pay for identical work in public sector employment under Framework Law 153/2017
ICCJ_230721
Preliminary reference on public sector salary equality under Framework Law 153/2017 dismissed as inadmissible
ICCJ_219298
Admissibility of supreme court referrals on local government salary grading, minimum wage linkage, and allowance calculation methodologies under Law-Framework No. 153/2017.
ICCJ_228031
Inadmissibility of reference on whether public authorities must reimburse rent and travel for public employees when service housing is unavailable

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish that the decision on the admissibility of the reference is binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 169 Dosar nr. 2669/1/2024

Ședința din 19 mai 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a VII-a pentru cauze privind conflicte de muncă şi asigurări sociale în Dosarul nr. 1.696/87/2023, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

Dacă angajaţii Administraţiei Naţionale «Apele Române», prin raportare la dispoziţiile art. 10 lit. d), Cap. II din anexa nr. VII la Legea-cadru nr.153/2017 privind salarizarea personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, au dreptul la spor de 15% de consemn, după data de 01.01.2023, indiferent dacă se produce sau nu evenimentul pentru care au fost consemnaţi la domiciliu?

Obligatorie, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 19 mai 2025.