Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_226576 AI generated

Personal assistant annual leave compensation ruling referral inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_226576
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Hunedoara Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether personal assistants may receive compensation for annual leave allowance and, if so, whether that right could be claimed on 12 February 2024 for 2020–2023. The court did not rule on the merits, so no award was made and the previous proceedings continue. The case involves a civil procedure question referred under the preliminary ruling mechanism (art. 519–521 of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure) concerning the interpretation of legislation on personal assistants’ annual leave indemnity. The dismissal was based on inadmissibility—likely because the question did not meet the statutory conditions for a preliminary ruling, such as raising a genuine issue of interpretation necessary for resolving the pending case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Personal assistant annual leave compensation ruling referral inadmissible: The court did not rule on the merits, so no award was made and the previous proceedings continue. The case involves a civil procedure question referred under the preliminary ruling mechanism (art. 519–521 of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure) concerning the interpretation of legislation on personal assistants’ annual leave indemnity. The dismissal was based on inadmissibility—likely because the question did not meet the statutory conditions for a preliminary ruling, such as raising a genuine issue of interpretation necessary for resolving the pending case.

Keywords

AI generated
annual leave compensation rules preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code pending proceedings statutory right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Declares the decision binding.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Declares the decision binding.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 166 Dosar nr. 2677/1/2024

Ședința din 19 mai 2025

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Hunedoara - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 444/97/2024, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

Dacă în cazul asistenţilor personali se poate acorda contravaloarea indemnizaţiei de concediu de odihnă, iar în caz afirmativ, dacă la data de 12 februarie 2024 se poate solicita acordarea acestui drept pentru perioada anilor 2020 - 2023 inclusiv.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 19 mai 2025.